The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ownership and Control of Farmland: Landlord‐Tenant Relations in Wisconsin1
Abstract
This paper addresses the ownership and control of farmland, presents a conceptual model of landed property, and uses it to examine landlord‐tenant relations in Wisconsin. A profile of farmland owners is constructed using survey data from two agricultural counties. Particular attention is paid to who controls farm management decisions on rented land. Results suggest that tenants enjoy much latitude in managing rented land and that relations between landlords and tenants seem satisfactory to both parties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Beckley Thomas Mark1990Class ideology and land tenure: a multi‐dimensional view of farmland leases in east central Wisconsin.M.S. thesis University of Wisconsin‐Madison.
- Gilbert Jess, 1984, “Changes in type, tenure, and concentration of U.S. farmland owners”, Rural Sociology and Development, 1, 135
- Harris Marshall, 1974, Agricultural Law Center Monograph 12
- Harvey David, 1982, The Limits to Capital
- Mooney Patrick, 1983, “Towards a class analysis of midwestern agriculture”, Rural Sociology, 48, 563
- Mooney Patrick, 1988, Class, Rationality, and the Family Farm
- Moyer D. David, 1969, Agriculture Information Bulletin 338
- 10.1080/03066158608438299 · DOI
- Parsons Kenneth H., 1945, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 157
- Pryor Frederick L., 1973, Property and Industrial Organization in Communist and Capitalist Nations
- Rogers Denise M., 1991, Leasing Farmland in the United States. AGES‐9159
- 10.5149/9781469611181_Salamon · DOI
- Salter Leonard A., 1943, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 146
- U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1989, National and Wisconsin Parts
- U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1990, Agricultural Economics and Land Ownership Survey (1988)
- Wells Miriam J., 1987, Farm Work and Fieldwork, 211
- Wright Erik Olin, 1979, Class Structure and Income Determination
- Wunderlich Gene, 1958, Yearbook of Agriculture, 1958. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 295
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Local Ownership and Community Resiliency*
Varghese, J., Krogman, N. T., Beckley, T. M., & Nadeau, S. (2006) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1526/003601106778070653 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, J., & Beckley, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Rural Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-579
- ISSN
- 0036-0112 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-0831
- OpenAlex
- W2167829224
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rural Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- agricultural land ownership, landlord-tenant relations, farm management decisions, landed property, farmland owners, Wisconsin agriculture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
