Cited by 34Protist diversity and phylogenyAquaculture disease management and microbiotaParasite Biology and Host Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Morphology of Diplomonad Flagellates: Spironucleus torosa N. Sp. from Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua L., and Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus (L.) and Hexamita salmonis Moore from Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill)

POYNTON, SARAH L., MORRISON, CAROL M.·1990·The Journal of Protozoology

Abstract

ABSTRACT. A diplomonad flagellate, Spironucleus torosa n. sp. is described from Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua and haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus. This is believed to be the 1st confirmed report of Spironucleus from a marine fish. Organisms swimming in the rectal lumen were broadly pyriform to elongate, and measured 10.5–18.6 μm long and 3.2–13.3 μm wide; other elongate organisms were attached to the rectal epithelium, via apical extensions appearing continuous with the microvilli. The posterior end of the body was extended into a caudal projection, on either side of which was a posteriolateral ring‐shaped protrusion or torus, with a recurrent flagellum emerging from its centre. A symmetrical system of microtubules and lamellae, forming a “V” in protargol impregnated specimens, supported the flanges of the body surrounding the tori, the tori themselves and the caudal projection. Supranuclear microtubules were an inverted V to U shape in transverse section, and an electron dense band accompanied the cytostomes. Lightly staining homogenous cytoplasm was usually present in the anterior part of the body, the remainder being highly vacuolated with numerous dark granules. In swimming organisms, rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) was present around the nuclei and cytostomes, and bacteria were occasionally seen in the cytoplasm. In “attached” organisms, RER was reduced, and bacteria were absent. Hexamita salmonis Moore from Salvelinus fontinalis was studied by light and scanning electron microscopy for comparison; its cytoplasm was not highly vacuolated. The two recurrent flagella emerged close together from the blunt posterior end of the body.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1990.tb01160.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Spironucleus torosa, the corresponding area of the cell mediates intimate contact with the epithelium of the host.

    “In the related flagellate Spironucleus torosa, which infects gadoid fish, this area of the cell has been seen to mediate intimate contact with the epithelium of the host (28).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Alexeieff A., 1910, Sur les flagellés intestinaux des poissons marins, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. Notes Rev., 5e Serie, I
  2. 10.1007/978-3-642-96910-2_65 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-3-642-96910-2_64 · DOI
  4. Becker C. D., 1977, Parasitic Protozoa, 357
  5. Brugerolle G., 1974, Contribution a l'étude cytologique et phylétique des diplozoaires (Zoomastigophorea, Diplozoa, Dangeard 1910). III. Étude ultrastructurale du genre Hexamita (Dujardin 1836), Protistologica, 83
  6. Brugerolle G., 1975, Contribution a l'étude cytologique et phylétique des diplozoaries (Zoomastigophorea, Diplozoa, Dangeard 1910). V. Nouvelle interprétation de l'organisation cellulaire de Giardia, Protistologica, 99
  7. Brugerolle G., 1975, Contribution a l'étude cytologique et phylétique des diplozoaries (Zoomastigophorea, Diplozoa, Dangeard 1910). VI. Caractères généraux des diplozoaries, Protistologica, 111
  8. Brugerolle G., 1973, Contribution a l'étude cytologique et phylétique des diplozoaries (Zoomastigophorea, Diplozoa Dangeard 1910). I. Étude ultrastructurale du genre Trepomonas (Dujardin), Protistologica, 339
  9. Brugerolle G., 1973, Contribution a l'étude cytologique et phylétique des diploaires (Zoomastigophorea, Diplozoa, Dangeard 1910) II. Étude ultrastructurale du genre Spironucleus (Lavier 1936), Protistologica, 495
  10. 10.2307/3276429 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1979.tb00140.x · DOI
  12. Holberton D. V., 1973, Fine structure of the ventral disc apparatus and the mechanism of attachment in the flagellate Giardia muris, J. Cell Sci., 13, 11, 10.1242/jcs.13.1.11 · DOI
  13. Honigberg B. M., 1981, Review of Advances in Parasitology (Proceedings of 4th International Congress of Parasitology, Warsaw, Poland, August 19–26, 1978), 205
  14. Humason G. L., 1979, Animal Tissue Techniques, 4th ed
  15. 10.2307/3272490 · DOI
  16. Kalackaja S. L., 1961, Parazitofauna ryb ozera Nievel. [Parasitofauna of fish of Lake Nevel], Uch. Zap. Vitebsk. Vet. Inst., 17, 115
  17. 10.1007/978-94-011-6847-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0031182000082767 · DOI
  19. Kulda J., 1964, Spironucleus elegans Lavier, parasite of fish, Cesk. Parasitol., 187
  20. Kulda J., 1978, Parasitic Protozoa, 1
  21. Lavier G., 1936, Sur quelques flagellés intestinaux de poissons marins, Ann. Parasitol., 278, 10.1051/parasite/1936143278 · DOI
  22. Lee J. J., 1985, An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa, 130
  23. Leger L., 1904, Notes sur les infusoires endoparasites, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen., 4e Série, 337
  24. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1980.tb04228.x · DOI
  25. Lom J., 1984, Diseases of Marine Animals, Vol. IV. Part I. Introduction and Pisces. Biologische Anstalt, 114
  26. Margolis L., 1979, Synopsis of the parasites of fishes of Canada, Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can., 199, 269
  27. 10.1577/1548-8659(1922)52[74:OSANSO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  28. Morrison C. M., 1987, Histology of the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua: an Atlas. Part One. Digestive tract and associated organs, Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 98, 219
  29. 10.1002/jmor.1050860302 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0025315400017148 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0044-8486(87)90023-8 · DOI
  32. Paperna I., 1981, Aquaculture of Grey Mullets, 411
  33. Polyanski Yu. I., 1958, Osnovnyie problemy parasit. ryb [Main Problems of Fish Parasitology], 55
  34. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208 · DOI
  35. 10.1083/jcb.22.3.697 · DOI
  36. Takeuchi A., 1972, Ultrastructural identification of spirochetes and flagellated microbes at the brush border of the large intestinal epithelium of the Rhesus monkey, Infect. Immun., 6, 1008, 10.1128/iai.6.6.1008-1018.1972 · DOI
  37. Wenrich D. H., 1935, Host‐parasite relations between parasitic protozoa and their hosts, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 75, 605
  38. Wierzbicka J., 1986, Flagellates Spironucleus mobilis sp. n. in Eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.), Acta Protozool., 25, 75

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
POYNTON, S. L., & MORRISON, C. M.
Affiliations
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Protozoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-09
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
369-383
ISSN
0022-3921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977625703
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Protozoology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
new species description, flagellate morphology, marine fish parasites, Gadus morhua, haddock, salmon, brook trout, microtubules, cytostome, rough endoplasmic reticulum, bacterial association
MeSH terms
Animals, Fishes, Trout, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review