The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications
Open accessAbstract
Generic statements (e.g., “Birds lay eggs”) express generalizations about categories. In this paper, we hypothesized that there is a paradoxical asymmetry at the core of generic meaning, such that these sentences have extremely strong implications but require little evidence to be judged true. Four experiments confirmed the hypothesized asymmetry: Participants interpreted novel generics such as “Lorches have purple feathers” as referring to nearly all lorches, but they judged the same novel generics to be true given a wide range of prevalence levels (e.g., even when only 10% or 30% of lorches had purple feathers). A second hypothesis, also confirmed by the results, was that novel generic sentences about dangerous or distinctive properties would be more acceptable than generic sentences that were similar but did not have these connotations. In addition to clarifying important aspects of generics’ meaning, these findings are applicable to a range of real‐world processes such as stereotyping and political discourse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Past research found that generic sentences implied that a property was broadly true (28,35,45,46) and conceptually central (37,38), and that the category expressed was stable with inherent properties (41,47).”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Cimpian et al. ([2010]) found that while generic claims of the form 'Ps (for example, men) are f (for example, resist green behaviour)' are generally accepted on relatively weak evidence, when they are unfamiliar with P, study participants construed such claims strongly, as conveying that almost all Ps are f.”
From Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms (2023) · cites this paper as Cimpian et al. [2010]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
Levinson, S. C. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813313 · Cited by 5,137
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,851
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.3.289 · Cited by 2,805
Murphy, G. L. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001 · Cited by 2,650
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543042003237 · Cited by 1,826
Carlson, G. N. (1977) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · Cited by 1,825
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Carlson G. N, 1995, The generic book, 224
- Carlson G. N., 1995, The generic book
- Gelman S. A., 2004, Mother‐child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69
- Grice H. P, 1975, Syntax and semantics, 41
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–212 of 212
Dutta, R. R. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05230-0
Hoorens, V., Hermans, F., & Bruckmüller, S. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106323
Reid, G., YİĞİT, S., Orvell, A., Foster‐Hanson, E., & Lei, R. F. (2025) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70095
When Do Generics Feel Justifiable? A Registered Report Bridging Key Theories
Hermans, F., Schaeken, W., Bruckmüller, S., & Hoorens, V. (2026) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.493
How Novices Interpret Generalizations and How Experts Use Them
Coon, J., Etz, A. J., Scontras, G., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70196
Cartwright, N. D., Munro, E., & Pemberton, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009408332.008
How should AI talk about us? LLMs and social generics
Zhu, T. A. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03076-9
Acquiring generic knowledge without induction in infancy
Shamsudheen, R., Diané, M., Takács, S., & Csibra, G. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107129
Huang, Y., Xiao, Q., Tang, X., & Yin, J. (2026) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2026.113432
Beenen, K. T., Beukeboom, C. J., Burgers, C. F., & Sommerauer, P. (2026) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502261478981
Prejudices are not like hinges
Raut, T. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05858-6
Lyu, Y., & Chen, J. X. (2026) · Discourse & Communication · doi:10.1177/17504813261498849
Metadata
- Authors
- Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cimpian, Andrei
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-18
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1452-1482
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6709
- PMC
- PMC2992340
- OpenAlex
- W2102602565
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R56HD036043, R01HD036043)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Keywords
- generic statements, category generalization, sentence acceptability, stereotyping, political discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review