Cited by 91Categorization, perception, and languageCultural Differences and ValuesChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cross‐Cultural Similarities and Differences in Person‐Body Reasoning: Experimental Evidence From the United Kingdom and Brazilian Amazon

Open access
Cohen, Emma, Burdett, Emily, Knight, Nicola, Barrett, Justin·2011·Cognitive Science

Abstract

We report the results of a cross‐cultural investigation of person‐body reasoning in the United Kingdom and northern Brazilian Amazon (Marajó Island). The study provides evidence that directly bears upon divergent theoretical claims in cognitive psychology and anthropology, respectively, on the cognitive origins and cross‐cultural incidence of mind‐body dualism. In a novel reasoning task, we found that participants across the two sample populations parsed a wide range of capacities similarly in terms of the capacities’ perceived anchoring to bodily function. Patterns of reasoning concerning the respective roles of physical and biological properties in sustaining various capacities did vary between sample populations, however. Further, the data challenge prior ad‐hoc categorizations in the empirical literature on the developmental origins of and cognitive constraints on psycho‐physical reasoning (e.g., in afterlife concepts). We suggest cross‐culturally validated categories of “Body Dependent” and “Body Independent” items for future developmental and cross‐cultural research in this emerging area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01172.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Cohen et al. study, the rural Brazilian subjects-most entirely without formal education-were more dualistic than the U.K. subjects.

    “What is particularly interesting about this study is that the rural Brazilian subjects -most of them entirely without formal education -were more dualistic than the U.K. subjects.”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2011

    Section 4.1 says the Brazilian participants tended to reason more dualistically than the UK participants. The Introduction says a majority of the Brazilian participants had minimal (1–3 years) or no formal schooling; it does not say that most had none at all. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Subjects were quite likely to say that, even if they had entered a rock, they would still remember things, see things, or know things, but relatively unlikely to say that they would feel achy or sore or feel hungry.

    “For instance, they were quite likely to say that, even if they had entered a rock, they would still remember things, see things, or know things, but relatively unlikely to say that they would feel achy or sore or feel hungry .”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2011

  • The sorts of capacities typically associated with mind tended to be seen as body-independent, while others remained tightly yoked to the physical body and many hover somewhere in between.

    “The sorts of capacities that we typically associate with mind tended to be seen as body-independent -easily migrating to the rock or the plant -while others remained tightly yoked to the physical body and many hover somewhere in between.”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2011

  • In one recent study, Emma Cohen et al. (2011) found that, when asked to imagine having left their own body and entered a rock or a plant, subjects in both rural Brazil and Oxford viewed their capacities as more or less 'body dependent.'

    “In one recent study, Emma Cohen et al. (2011) found that, when asked to imagine having left their own body and entered a rock or a plant, subjects in both rural Brazil and Oxford viewed their capacities as more or less ' body dependent. '”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2011

  • Cohen et al. speculate that this may be due to the U.K. subjects' exposure to Western biomedical and neurological education, with its message of an integrated mind-body system.

    “Cohen et al. speculate that this may be due to the U.K. subjects ' exposure to Western biomedical and neurological education, with its message of an integrated mind -body system.”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Cohen et al. 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01008.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/1467-9655.00071 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/03640210802066907 · DOI
  4. Baillargeon R., 1995, Advances in infancy research, 305
  5. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.217 · DOI
  6. 10.1348/026151005X36498 · DOI
  7. Bloom P., 2004, Descartes’ baby: How child development explains what makes us human
  8. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/00141840801927558 · DOI
  10. 10.1163/156770908X289198 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00013.x · DOI
  12. 10.1017/CBO9780511521072 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0308275X9801800104 · DOI
  14. Harris M., 2000, Life on the Amazon: The anthropology of a Brazilian peasant village
  15. 10.1163/1568537054068606 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90027-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1163/156853708X358236 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02969.x · DOI
  19. 10.1177/092137409100400307 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.007 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/CBO9780511802782.005 · DOI
  23. Lewis G., 2004, Knowledge of illness in Sepik society: A study of the Gnau, New Guinea
  24. 10.1525/maq.1996.10.3.02a00030 · DOI
  25. 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.913 · DOI
  26. Murray L., 1985, Social perception in infants, 177
  27. 10.1111/1467-8624.00289 · DOI
  28. 10.1353/mpq.2002.0020 · DOI
  29. Nugent S., 1993, Amazonian Caboclo society: An essay on invisibility and peasant economy
  30. 10.1177/0308275X9701700103 · DOI
  31. 10.1515/9781685858278 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/3034825 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.005 · DOI
  36. 10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1124 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90039-6 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.605 · DOI
  40. Spelke E. S., 1995, Causal cognition, 150
  41. 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1994.tb00266.x · DOI
  42. 10.3998/mpub.10587 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/1467-9655.00007 · DOI
  44. Wagley C., 1976, Amazon Town: A study of man in the tropics
  45. Wellman H., 2008, Psycho‐physical dualism today: An interdisciplinary approach, 3
  46. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, E., Burdett, E., Knight, N., & Barrett, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Emma
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1282-1304
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2011838907
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
mind-body dualism, cross-cultural cognition, physiological function, cognitive development, Marajó Island, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Child, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Human Body, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review