Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitivity of New‐generation Computed Tomography in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Open access
Sames, Thomas A., Storrow, Alan B., Finkelstein, Jeff A., Magoon, Michael R.·1996·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of the initial new‐generation CT (NGCT) scan interpretation for detection of acute nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to decide whether lumbar puncture (LP) should follow a “normal” NGCT scan. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients admitted between March 1988 and July 1994 with proven SAH. Exclusion criteria were age <2 years, diagnosis other than acute SAH, history of head trauma within 24 hours before symptom onset, NGCT scan not done before diagnosis, and records not available. Patients were placed into two groups: symptom duration <24 hours (group 1) and >24 hours (group 2) prior to CT scan. The resolution of each NGCT scanner was recorded. An NGCT sceinner was defined as a third‐generation scanner or more recent. Results: Of 349 SAH patients, 181 met inclusion criteria. The sensitivity of NGCT scans for SAH was 93.1% for the group 1 patients (n = 144) and 83.8% for the group 2 patients (n = 37). The overall sensitivity was 91.2%. All the patients who had SAH not detected by NGCT scans were diagnosed by LP. There was no significant relationship between NGCT scanner resolution and sensitivity for SAH. Conclusion: Initial interpretation of NGCT scans to detect SAH does not approach 100% sensitivity. A “normal” NGCT scan does not reliably exclude the need for LP in patients who have symptoms suggestive of SAH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03296.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Sames, T. A., Storrow, A. B., Finkelstein, J. A., & Magoon, M. R.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
16-20
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W1995266466
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of New‐generation Computed Tomography in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03296.x
The paper
Sames, T. A., Storrow, A. B., Finkelstein, J. A., & Magoon, M. R. (1996). Sensitivity of New‐generation Computed Tomography in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03296.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.