The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of Left Ventricular Function by Emergency Physician Echocardiography of Hypotensive Patients
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency physicians (EPs) with goal-directed training can use echocardiography to accurately assess left ventricular function (LVF) in hypotensive emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: Prospective, observational study at an urban teaching ED with >100,000 visits/year. Four EP investigators with prior ultrasound experience underwent focused echocardiography training. A convenience sample of 51 adult patients with symptomatic hypotension was enrolled. Exclusion criteria were a history of trauma, chest compressions, or electrocardiogram diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction. A five-view transthoracic echocardiogram was recorded by an EP investigator who estimated ejection fraction (EF) and categorized LVF as normal, depressed, or severely depressed. A blinded cardiologist reviewed all 51 studies for EF, categorization of function, and quality of the study. Twenty randomly selected studies were reviewed by a second cardiologist to determine interobserver variability. RESULTS: Comparison of EP vs. primary cardiologist estimate of EF yielded a Pearson's correlation coefficient R = 0.86. This compared favorably with interobserver correlation between cardiologists (R = 0.84). In categorization of LVF, the weighted agreement between EPs and the primary cardiologist was 84%, with a weighted kappa of 0.61 (p < 0.001). Echocardiographic quality was rated by the primary cardiologist as good in 33%, moderate in 43%, and poor in 22%. The EF was significantly lower in patients with a cardiac cause of hypotension vs. other patients (25 +/- 10% vs. 48 +/- 17%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians with focused training in echocardiography can accurately determine LVF in hypotensive patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Labovitz, A. J., Noble, V. E., Bierig, M., Goldstein, S. A., Jones, R., Kort, S., Porter, T. R., Spencer, K. T., Tayal, V. S., & Wei, K. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005 · Cited by 769
Self-citation(2015) · doi:10.1002/ejhf.289 · Cited by 417
Breitkreutz, R., Walcher, F., & Seeger, F. H. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000260626.23848.fc · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, C. L., Rose, G. A., Tayal, V. S., Sullivan, D. M., Arrowood, J. A., & Kline, J. A.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 186-193
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107242714
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Left Ventricular Function by Emergency Physician Echocardiography of Hypotensive Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb00242.x
- The paper
- Moore, C. L., Rose, G. A., Tayal, V. S., Sullivan, D. M., Arrowood, J. A., & Kline, J. A. (2002). Determination of Left Ventricular Function by Emergency Physician Echocardiography of Hypotensive Patients. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb00242.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.