The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM): Pilot Study of a Simulation-based Crisis Management Course for Emergency Medicine
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine participant perceptions of Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM), a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine. METHODS: EMCRM was created using Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM) as a template. Thirteen residents participated in one of three pilot courses of EMCRM; following a didactic session on principles of human error and crisis management, the residents participated in simulated emergency department crisis scenarios and instructor-facilitated debriefing. The crisis simulations involved a computer-enhanced mannequin simulator and standardized patients. After finishing the course, study subjects completed a horizontal numerical scale survey (1 = worst rating to 5 = best rating) of their perceptions of EMCRM. Descriptive statistics were calculated to evaluate the data. RESULTS: The study subjects found EMCRM to be enjoyable (4.9 +/- 0.3) (mean +/- SD) and reported that the knowledge gained from the course would be helpful in their practices (4.5 +/- 0.6). The subjects believed that the simulation environment prompted realistic responses (4.6 +/- 0.8) and that the scenarios were highly believable (4.8 +/- 0.4). The participants reported that EMCRM was best suited for residents (4.9 +/- 0.3) but could also benefit students and attending physicians. The subjects believed that the course should be repeated every 8.2 +/- 3.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The EMCRM participants rated the course very favorably and believed that the knowledge gained would be beneficial in their practices. The extremely positive response to EMCRM found in this pilot study suggests that this training modality may be valuable in training emergency medicine residents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Utility of Simulation in Medical Education: What Is the Evidence?
Okuda, Y., Bryson, E. O., DeMaria, S., Jacobson, L., Quinones, J., Shen, B., & Levine, A. I. (2009) · Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.1002/msj.20127 · Cited by 1,201
The Effects of Acute Stress on Performance: Implications for Health Professions Education
LeBlanc, V. R. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181b37b8f · Cited by 713
Donovan, J., Little, P., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., Frankel, S., Neal, D., & Hamdy, F. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766 · Cited by 533
The Future Vision of Simulation in Healthcare
Gaba, D. M. (2007) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/01.sih.0000258411.38212.32 · Cited by 465
Self-citationAssessment of Resident Professionalism Using High‐fidelity Simulation of Ethical Dilemmas
Gisondi, M. A., Smith‐Coggins, R., Harter, P. M., Soltysik, R. C., & Yarnold, P. R. (2004) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.04.005 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reznek, M. A., Smith‐Coggins, R., Howard, S. K., Kiran, K., Harter, P., Sowb, Y. A., Gaba, D. M., & Krummel, T. M.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 386-389
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146402851
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM): Pilot Study of a Simulation-based Crisis Management Course for Emergency Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x
- The paper
- Reznek, M. A., Smith‐Coggins, R., Howard, S. K., Kiran, K., Harter, P., Sowb, Y. A., Gaba, D. M., & Krummel, T. M. (2003). Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM): Pilot Study of a Simulation-based Crisis Management Course for Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.