Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation in Graduate Medical Education 2008: A Review for Emergency Medicine

McLaughlin, Steve, Fitch, Michael T., Goyal, Deepi G., Hayden, Emily, Kauh, Christine Yang, Laack, Torrey A., Nowicki, Thomas, Okuda, Yasuharu, Palm, Ken, Pozner, Charles N., Vozenilek, John, Wang, Ernest, Gordon, James A., on behalf of the SAEM Technology in Medical Education Committee and the Simulation Interest Group·2008·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Health care simulation includes a variety of educational techniques used to complement actual patient experiences with realistic yet artificial exercises. This field is rapidly growing and is widely used in emergency medicine (EM) graduate medical education (GME) programs. We describe the state of simulation in EM resident education, including its role in learning and assessment. The use of medical simulation in GME is increasing for a number of reasons, including the limitations of the 80‐hour resident work week, patient dissatisfaction with being “practiced on,” a greater emphasis on patient safety, and the importance of early acquisition of complex clinical skills. Simulation‐based assessment (SBA) is advancing to the point where it can revolutionize the way clinical competence is assessed in residency training programs. This article also discusses the design of simulation centers and the resources available for developing simulation programs in graduate EM education. The level of interest in these resources is evident by the numerous national EM organizations with internal working groups focusing on simulation. In the future, the health care system will likely follow the example of the airline industry, nuclear power plants, and the military, making rigorous simulation‐based training and evaluation a routine part of education and practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00188.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
McLaughlin, S., Fitch, M. T., Goyal, D. G., Hayden, E., Kauh, C. Y., Laack, T. A., Nowicki, T., Okuda, Y., Palm, K., Pozner, C. N., Vozenilek, J., Wang, E., Gordon, J. A., & on behalf of the SAEM Technology in Medical Education Committee and the Simulation Interest Group
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1117-1129
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2060552128
Cited by
167
References
4
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation in Graduate Medical Education 2008: A Review for Emergency Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00188.x
The paper
McLaughlin, S., Fitch, M. T., Goyal, D. G., Hayden, E., Kauh, C. Y., Laack, T. A., Nowicki, T., Okuda, Y., Palm, K., Pozner, C. N., Vozenilek, J., Wang, E., Gordon, J. A., & on behalf of the SAEM Technology in Medical Education Committee and the Simulation Interest Group. (2008). Simulation in Graduate Medical Education 2008: A Review for Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00188.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.