Cited by 141Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Repeated Physical Disturbance on Soft Tissue Decomposition—Are Taphonomic Studies an Accurate Reflection of Decomposition?*

Adlam, Rachel E., Simmons, Tal·2007·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: Although the relationship between decomposition and postmortem interval has been well studied, almost no studies examined the potential effects of physical disturbance occurring as a result of data collection procedures. This study compares physically disturbed rabbit carcasses with a series of undisturbed carcasses to assess the presence and magnitude of any effects resulting from repetitive disturbance. Decomposition was scored using visual assessment of soft tissue changes, and numerical data such as weight loss and carcass temperature were recorded. The effects of disturbance over time on weight loss, carcass temperature, soil pH and decomposition were studied. In addition, this study aimed to validate some of the anecdotal evidence regarding decomposition. Results indicate disturbance significantly inversely affects both weight loss and carcass temperature. No differences were apparent between groups for soil pH change or overall decomposition stage. An insect‐mediated mechanism for the disturbance effect is suggested, along with indications as to why this effect may be cancelled when scoring overall decomposition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00510.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.2307/2422385 · DOI
  2. 10.1071/ZO9570001 · DOI
  3. 10.1520/JFS13311J · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1934999 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/2191180a0 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/2424107 · DOI
  7. 10.1520/JFS11524J · DOI
  8. 10.1520/JFS13492J · DOI
  9. 10.1603/0022-2585-41.3.511 · DOI
  10. WeigeltJ.Recent ertebrate carcasses and their paleobiological implications. Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press 1927.
  11. ClarkMA WorrellMB PlessJE.Postmortem changes in soft tissues. In:HaglundWD SorgMH editors.Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton:CRC Press 1997;151–64.
  12. GallowayA.The process of decomposition: a model from the Arizona‐Sonoran desert. In:HaglundWD SorgMH editors.Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton:CRC Press 1997;139–50. · DOI
  13. Korshunov NV, 2003, Possibilities of estimation of the time interval necessary for the development of putrefactive manifestation in the corpse, Forensic Sci Int, 136, 223
  14. 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1520/JFS2003337 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00018-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1520/JFS11103J · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  19. HaslamTCF.An investigation of soft tissue decomposition in three soils of contrasting pH under controlled conditions [MSc thesis]. Bournemouth U.K.:Bournemouth University 2002.
  20. 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00063-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1520/JFS2003247 · DOI
  22. 10.1097/00000433-199109000-00013 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71683-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1520/JFS16090J · DOI
  25. HaskellNH HallRD CervenkaVJ ClarkMA.On the body: insects’ life stage presence their postmortem artefacts. In:HaglundWD SorgMH editors.Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton:CRC Press 1997;415–48. · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S1164-5563(02)00007-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00043-X · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00411-X · DOI
  29. Gill‐KingH.Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. In:HaglundWD SorgMH editors.Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton:CRC Press 1997;93–108. · DOI
  30. BassWM.Outdoor decomposition rates in Tennessee. In:HaglundWD SorgMH editors.Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton:CRC Press 1997;181–6.
  31. LymanRL.Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge U.K.:Cambridge University Press 1994.
  32. 10.1520/JFS14780J · DOI
  33. 10.1520/JFS14877J · DOI
  34. ByrdJH CastnerJL.Insects of forensic importance. In:ByrdJH CastnerJL editors.Forensic entomology: the utility of arthropods in legal investigations. Boca Raton:CRC Press 2001;43–80. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adlam, R. E., & Simmons, T.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-28
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
1007-1014
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W2089758534
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
soft tissue decomposition, physical disturbance, taphonomy, postmortem interval estimation, carcass weight loss, carcass temperature, soil pH, rabbit carcasses, forensic entomology
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Body Temperature, Body Weight, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Myiasis, Postmortem Changes, Rabbits, Soil, Forensic Anthropology, Models, Animal, Forensic Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review