The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Potency of Δ9–THC and Other Cannabinoids in Cannabis in England in 2005: Implications for Psychoactivity and Pharmacology*
Abstract
Abstract: Gas chromatography was used to study the cannabinoid content (“potency”) of illicit cannabis seized by police in England in 2004/5. Of the four hundred and fifty two samples, indoor‐grown unpollinated female cannabis (“sinsemilla”) was the most frequent form, followed by resin (hashish) and imported outdoor‐grown herbal cannabis (marijuana). The content of the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ 9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) varied widely. The median THC content of herbal cannabis and resin was 2.1% and 3.5%, respectively. The median 13.9% THC content of sinsemilla was significantly higher than that recorded in the UK in 1996/8. In sinsemilla and imported herbal cannabis, the content of the antipsychotic cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) was extremely low. In resin, however, the average CBD content exceeded that of THC, and the relative proportions of the two cannabinoids varied widely between samples. The increases in average THC content and relative popularity of sinsemilla cannabis, combined with the absence of the anti‐psychotic cannabinoid CBD, suggest that the current trends in cannabis use pose an increasing risk to those users susceptible to the harmful psychological effects associated with high doses of THC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects.
Russo, E. B. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x · Cited by 1,535
Di Forti, M., Quattrone, D., Freeman, T. P., Tripoli, G., Gayer-Anderson, C., Quigley, H., Rodriguez, V., Jongsma, H. E., Ferraro, L., La Cascia, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30048-3 · Cited by 875
Bhattacharyya, S., Morrison, P. D., Fusar-Poli, P., Martin-Santos, R., Borgwardt, S., Winton-Brown, T., Nosarti, C., O' Carroll, C. M., Seal, M., Allen, P., et al. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.184 · Cited by 680
Practical considerations in medical cannabis administration and dosing
MacCallum, C. A., & Russo, E. B. (2018) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.004 · Cited by 663
Di Forti, M., Marconi, A., Carra, E., Fraietta, S., Trotta, A., Bonomo, M., Bianconi, F., Gardner-Sood, P., O'Connor, J., Russo, M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00117-5 · Cited by 588
Metadata
- Authors
- Potter, D. J., Clark, P., & Brown, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-94
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4029
- OpenAlex
- W2022901997
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potency of Δ9–THC and Other Cannabinoids in Cannabis in England in 2005: Implications for Psychoactivity and Pharmacology*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00603.x
- The paper
- Potter, D. J., Clark, P., & Brown, M. B. (2008). Potency of Δ9–THC and Other Cannabinoids in Cannabis in England in 2005: Implications for Psychoactivity and Pharmacology*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00603.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.