The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENY
Open accessAbstract
With the advent of relatively objective classifications, such as the phenetic classifications produced by the operational techniques of numerical taxonomy (Sokal and Sneath, 1963), it was inevitable that biologists would wonder what phylogenetic conclusions could be drawn from them and with what reliability.If these phenetic taxonomies did not reflect all of the elements of phyletics (Sokal and Camin, 1965), could techniques be devised for deducing the latter?For example, could operational methods be devised for deducing the cladistic relationships among taxa, so that, given the same initial information, different investigators would obtain the same results?By cladistic relationships we mean the evolutionary branching sequences among taxonomic units without regard to phenetic similarities among them or to an absolute time scale.There is no question that phylogenies could probably be reconstructed without error for any taxonomic group if complete fossil sequences for that group were available.However, can cladistic reconstructions be carried out with any degree of 1 This paper was presented on December 29, 1964, at a symposium entitled "Interactions between numerical and orthodox taxonomies" at Knoxville, Tennessee, before the Society of Systematic Zoology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices
Farris, J. S. (1972) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282802 · Cited by 1,533
A Simple and Robust Statistical Test for Detecting the Presence of Recombination
Bruen, T. C., Philippe, H., & Bryant, D. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048975 · Cited by 1,382
A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting
Farris, J. S. (1969) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412182 · Cited by 1,249
Metadata
- Authors
- Camin, J. H., & Sokal, R. R.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1965-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-326
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2120653759
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01722.x
- The paper
- Camin, J. H., & Sokal, R. R. (1965). A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENY. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01722.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.