PHLOX AND COLIAS : THE EFFICIENCY OF A POLLINATION SYSTEM
Open accessAbstract
Donald A. Levin, Denis E. Berube; PHLOX AND COLIAS: THE EFFICIENCY OF A POLLINATION SYSTEM, Evolution, Volume 26, Issue 2, 1 June 1972, Pages 242–250, http
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phlox is a butterfly-pollinated genus.
“Phlox is a butterfly‐pollinated genus”
From Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators (2017) · cites this paper as Levin & Berube, 1972
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators
Briggs, H. M., Graham, S., Switzer, C. M., & Hopkins, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/210377 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levin, D. A., & Berube, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- ORCID
- Levin, Donald A.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1972-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242-250
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2324941421
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (GB‐17987)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- pollination efficiency, pollination systems, Phlox, Colias, plant-pollinator interactions, pollination syndromes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
