Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF THE LARGE SUBUNIT OF CARBOXYLASE ( rbcL ) NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AMONG THE GRASSES (GRAMINEAE)

Open access
Doebley, John, Durbin, Mary, Golenberg, Edward M., Clegg, Michael T., Ma, Din Pow·1990·Evolution

Abstract

The full nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast encoded large subunit of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) are available for nine grass species and partial sequence data for one species. Relative rate tests of the “molecular clock” hypothesis suggest that rbcL evolved more rapidly in the lineage leading to Zea than in those leading to the other species. The estimated overall substitution rate for rbcL among these grasses is about 5 times 10−10 substitutions per site per year, or about one‐half the synonymous rate. The nine full sequences were analyzed by the UPGMA, Wagner parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Fitch‐Margoliash methods. The latter three methods produced trees with the same topology. This topology largely agrees with current taxonomic evidence regarding the relationships among these grasses. UPGMA produced a topology that conflicts more substantially with available taxonomic evidence. Statistical comparison of the three alternative topologies for the subfamilies Panicoideae, Pooideae and Bambusoideae failed to support one of these topologies over the others, reflecting the taxonomic ambiguities surrounding the relationships among these taxa. Phylogenetic analyses based on the partial sequences of all 10 species gave conflicting results with regard to the relationship between Hordeum and Triticum, both members of the tribe Triticeae. This indicates that rbcL sequences contain too little information to resolve relationships among genera within this tribe. Overall, the results suggest that rbcL sequence data can provide some new information concerning grass phylogeny, but that the amount of available data from this gene is too small to differentiate statistically among alternative topologies for the grasses. Conflicting results from parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Fitch‐Margoliash methods proved useful in exploring the validity of assumptions underlying these methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03828.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Doebley, J., Durbin, M., Golenberg, E. M., Clegg, M. T., & Ma, D. P.
Venue
Evolution
Published
1990-07
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1097-1108
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
OpenAlex
W1967893969
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
22.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF THE LARGE SUBUNIT OF CARBOXYLASE ( rbcL ) NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AMONG THE GRASSES (GRAMINEAE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03828.x
The paper
Doebley, J., Durbin, M., Golenberg, E. M., Clegg, M. T., & Ma, D. P. (1990). EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF THE LARGE SUBUNIT OF CARBOXYLASE ( rbcL ) NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AMONG THE GRASSES (GRAMINEAE). Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03828.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.