The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Abstract
Aging may be a consequence of mutation accumulation or of negative pleiotropic correlations between performance late and earlier in the lifespan. This study used artificial selection on flies derived from two different base stocks to produce "young" and "old" lines, propagated by breeding from young and old adults respectively. Virgin and mated adults of both sexes from the "old" lines lived longer than "young" line flies. "Young" and "old" mated females did not differ in fecundity or fertility early in the lifespan, but "old" line females had higher fecundity and fertility late in life. The results therefore suggested either that the response to selection had revealed the effect of mutation accumulation, or that pleiotropy involving characters other than early fecundity must have been involved. Development time from egg to adult was longer in the "old" lines. Competition of selected line larvae from one base stock against mutant marked larvae from the same base stock revealed that, at a wide range of larval densities, "old" line larvae showed lower survival rates than "young" line larvae. Thorax length and wet weight were significantly greater in the "old" line flies from one base stock. The results may imply that the selection regime in the "old" lines favored extended growth during development to produce a more durable adult soma, despite the cost in increased larval mortality and delayed reproduction, because the potential reproductive benefits later in life were increased. However, the differences between larvae from "old" and "young" lines could also be attributable to density differences, and this possibility needs systematic investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence.
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02911.x · Cited by 4,279
Miller, R. G. (1981) · Cited by 3,336
Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack's Principle
Williams, G. C. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282461 · Cited by 3,276
The moulding of senescence by natural selection
Hamilton, W. D. (1966) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6 · Cited by 2,263
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
AN UNSOLVED PROBLEM OF BIOLOGY
(1953) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1953.tb84985.x · Cited by 1,805
Costs of Reproduction: An Evaluation of the Empirical Evidence
Reznick, D. (1985) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544698 · Cited by 1,335
LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF POSTPONED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Rose, M. R. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00370.x · Cited by 952
Evolution in Age-Structured Populations
Gilbert, N., & Charlesworth, B. (1981) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4092 · Cited by 946
Cited by
Optimally, mutation and the evolution of ageing
Partridge, L., & Barton, N. H. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362305a0 · Cited by 668
Self-citationExtraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of ageing
Keller, L., & Genoud, M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/40130 · Cited by 598
Hormones and the physiological architecture of life history evolution
Finch, C. E., & Rose, M. R. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418864 · Cited by 376
Vieira, C., Pasyukova, E. G., Zeng, Z.-B., Hackett, J. B., Lyman, R. F., & Mackay, T. F. C. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/154.1.213 · Cited by 340
Sex-specific quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster
Nuzhdin, S. V., Pasyukova, E. G., Dilda, C. L., Zeng, Z.-B., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.18.9734 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, L., & Fowler, K.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-91
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335741872
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 26.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01986.x
- The paper
- Partridge, L., & Fowler, K. (1992). DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01986.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.