The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HETEROGENEOUS GENOMIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN WALKING-STICK ECOTYPES: "ISOLATION BY ADAPTATION" AND MULTIPLE ROLES FOR DIVERGENT SELECTION
Open accessAbstract
Genetic differentiation can be highly variable across the genome. For example, loci under divergent selection and those tightly linked to them may exhibit elevated differentiation compared to neutral regions. These represent "outlier loci" whose differentiation exceeds neutral expectations. Adaptive divergence can also increase genome-wide differentiation by promoting general barriers to neutral gene flow, thereby facilitating genomic divergence via genetic drift. This latter process can yield a positive correlation between adaptive phenotypic divergence and neutral genetic differentiation (described here as "isolation-by-adaptation"). Here, we examine both these processes by combining an AFLP genome scan of two host plant ecotypes of Timema cristinae walking-sticks with existing data on adaptive phenotypic divergence and ecological speciation in these insects. We found that about 8% of loci are outliers in multiple population comparisons. Replicated comparisons between population-pairs using the same versus different host species revealed that 1-2% of loci are subject to host-related selection specifically. Locus-specific analyses revealed that up to 10% of putatively neutral (nonoutlier) AFLP loci exhibit significant isolation-by-adaptation. Our results suggest that selection may affect differentiation directly, via linkage, or by facilitating genetic drift. They thus illustrate the varied and sometimes nonintuitive contributions of selection to heterogeneous genomic differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment
Kumar, S. (2004) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/5.2.150 · Cited by 11,756
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
Wright, S. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.2.114 · Cited by 5,479
Principles of Population Genetics.
Cormack, R. M., Hartl, D. L., & Clark, A. G. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531471 · Cited by 5,242
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
Manly, B. F. J. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315273075 · Cited by 4,194
Cited by
Evidence for Ecological Speciation and Its Alternative
Schluter, D. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1160006 · Cited by 1,516
Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish
Seehausen, O., Terai, Y., Magalhaes, I. S., Carleton, K. L., Mrosso, H. D. J., Miyagi, R., van der Sluijs, I., Schneider, M. V., Maan, M. E., Tachida, H., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07285 · Cited by 1,083
Genomics and the origin of species
Seehausen, O., Butlin, R. K., Keller, I., Wagner, C. E., Boughman, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Peichel, C. L., Saetre, G.-P., Bank, C., Brännström, Å., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3644 · Cited by 1,016
The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow
Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P., & Nosil, P. (2012) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.009 · Cited by 832
Self-citationHybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries
(2014) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esu033 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Nosil, P., Egan, S. P., & Funk, D. J.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-336
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2056697366
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 134
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HETEROGENEOUS GENOMIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN WALKING-STICK ECOTYPES: "ISOLATION BY ADAPTATION" AND MULTIPLE ROLES FOR DIVERGENT SELECTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x
- The paper
- Nosil, P., Egan, S. P., & Funk, D. J. (2008). HETEROGENEOUS GENOMIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN WALKING-STICK ECOTYPES: "ISOLATION BY ADAPTATION" AND MULTIPLE ROLES FOR DIVERGENT SELECTION. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.