The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EFFICACY OF DIVERGENCE HITCHHIKING IN GENERATING GENOMIC ISLANDS DURING ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION
Open accessAbstract
Genes under divergent selection flow less readily between populations than other loci. This observation has led to verbal “divergence hitchhiking” models of speciation in which decreased interpopulation gene flow surrounding loci under divergent selection can generate large regions of differentiation within the genome (genomic islands). The efficacy of this model in promoting speciation depends on the size of the region affected by divergence hitchhiking. Empirical evidence is mixed, with examples of both large and small genomic islands. To address these empirical discrepancies and to formalize the theory, we present mathematical models of divergence hitchhiking, which examine neutral differentiation around selected sites. For a single locus under selection, regions of differentiation do not extend far along a chromosome away from a selected site unless both effective population sizes and migration rates are low. When multiple loci are considered, regions of differentiation can be larger. However, with many loci under selection, genome-wide divergence occurs and genomic islands are erased. The results show that divergence hitchhiking can generate large regions of differentiation, but that the conditions under which this occurs are limited. Thus, speciation may often require multifarious selection acting on many, isolated and physically unlinked genes. How hitchhiking promotes further adaptive divergence warrants consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Turner, T. L., & Hahn, M. W. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm143 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Cruickshank, T. E., & Hahn, M. W. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12796 · Cited by 1,061
Andrew, R. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12106 · Cited by 116
Determining epistatic selection in admixed populations
Schumer, M., & Brandvain, Y. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13641 · Cited by 57
Highly replicated evolution of parapatric ecotypes
James, M. E., Arenas-Castro, H., Groh, J. S., Allen, S. L., Engelstädter, J., & Ortiz-Barrientos, D. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab207 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Feder, J. L., & Nosil, P.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1729-1747
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917291711
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFICACY OF DIVERGENCE HITCHHIKING IN GENERATING GENOMIC ISLANDS DURING ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00943.x
- The paper
- Feder, J. L., & Nosil, P. (2010). THE EFFICACY OF DIVERGENCE HITCHHIKING IN GENERATING GENOMIC ISLANDS DURING ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00943.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.