Cited by 184Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behavior

SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS: SENSORY DRIVE IN BIRDSONG EVOLUTION

Tobias, Joseph A., Aben, Job, Brumfield, Robb T., Derryberry, Elizabeth P., Halfwerk, Wouter, Slabbekoorn, Hans, Seddon, Nathalie·2010·Evolution

Abstract

Visual signals are shaped by variation in the signaling environment through a process termed sensory drive, sometimes leading to speciation. However, the evidence for sensory drive in acoustic signals is restricted to comparisons between highly dissimilar habitats, or single-species studies in which it is difficult to rule out the influence of undetected ecological variables, pleiotropic effects, or chance. Here we assess whether this form of sensory drive-often termed "acoustic adaptation"-can generate signal divergence across ecological gradients. By studying avian communities in two Amazonian forest types, we show that songs of 17 "bamboo-specialist" bird species differ in predictable ways from their nearest relatives in adjacent terra firme forest. We also demonstrate that the direction of song divergence is correlated with the sound transmission properties of habitats, rather than with genetic divergence, ambient noise, or pleiotropic effects of mass and bill size. Our findings indicate that acoustic adaptation adds significantly to stochastic processes underlying song divergence, even when comparing between habitats with relatively similar structure. Furthermore, given that song differences potentially contribute to reproductive isolation, these findings are consistent with a wider role for sensory drive in the diversification of lineages with acoustic mating signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01067.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical evidence on the AAH as a driver of the acoustic output of ecological communities is mixed.

    “However, empirical evidence on AAH as a driver of the acoustic output of ecological communities is also mixed”

    From Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Tobias et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobias, J. A., Aben, J., Brumfield, R. T., Derryberry, E. P., Halfwerk, W., Slabbekoorn, H., & Seddon, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Evolution
Published
2010-08-19
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
no-no
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109337567
Cited by
184
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0400797, 0543562)
  • Ecological Society of America
  • Royal Society
  • British Ecological Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
sensory drive, acoustic adaptation, bird song, song divergence, acoustic signals, terra firme forest, Amazon rainforest, reproductive isolation, speciation, ecological gradients
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Stochastic Processes, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review