SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS: SENSORY DRIVE IN BIRDSONG EVOLUTION
Abstract
Visual signals are shaped by variation in the signaling environment through a process termed sensory drive, sometimes leading to speciation. However, the evidence for sensory drive in acoustic signals is restricted to comparisons between highly dissimilar habitats, or single-species studies in which it is difficult to rule out the influence of undetected ecological variables, pleiotropic effects, or chance. Here we assess whether this form of sensory drive-often termed "acoustic adaptation"-can generate signal divergence across ecological gradients. By studying avian communities in two Amazonian forest types, we show that songs of 17 "bamboo-specialist" bird species differ in predictable ways from their nearest relatives in adjacent terra firme forest. We also demonstrate that the direction of song divergence is correlated with the sound transmission properties of habitats, rather than with genetic divergence, ambient noise, or pleiotropic effects of mass and bill size. Our findings indicate that acoustic adaptation adds significantly to stochastic processes underlying song divergence, even when comparing between habitats with relatively similar structure. Furthermore, given that song differences potentially contribute to reproductive isolation, these findings are consistent with a wider role for sensory drive in the diversification of lineages with acoustic mating signals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical evidence on the AAH as a driver of the acoustic output of ecological communities is mixed.
“However, empirical evidence on AAH as a driver of the acoustic output of ecological communities is also mixed”
From Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Tobias et al., 2010
Cites
Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds
Morton, E. S. (1975) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282971 · Cited by 1,665 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis
Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2022) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12890 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“However, empirical evidence on AAH as a driver of the acoustic output of ecological communities is also mixed (Ey & Fischer, 2009; Tobias et al., 2010), and meta-analytical support reveals that the overall effect size is weak (Boncoraglio & Saino, 2007).”
BackgroundSpecies coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation
Tobias, J. A., Cornwallis, C. K., Derryberry, E. P., Claramunt, S., Brumfield, R. T., & Seddon, N. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12874 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationEcological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Derryberry, G. E., Claramunt, S., Seeholzer, G. F., Brumfield, R. T., & Tobias, J. A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3760 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tobias, J. A., Aben, J., Brumfield, R. T., Derryberry, E. P., Halfwerk, W., Slabbekoorn, H., & Seddon, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Leiden University (NL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08-19
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- no-no
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109337567
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0400797, 0543562)
- Ecological Society of America
- Royal Society
- British Ecological Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- sensory drive, acoustic adaptation, bird song, song divergence, acoustic signals, terra firme forest, Amazon rainforest, reproductive isolation, speciation, ecological gradients
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Stochastic Processes, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review