The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CALIBRATING DIVERGENCE TIMES ON SPECIES TREES VERSUS GENE TREES: IMPLICATIONS FOR SPECIATION HISTORY OF APHELOCOMA JAYS: DIVERGENCE DATING ON SPECIES TREES
Open accessAbstract
Estimates of the timing of divergence are central to testing the underlying causes of speciation. Relaxed molecular clocks and fossil calibration have improved these estimates; however, these advances are implemented in the context of gene trees, which can overestimate divergence times. Here we couple recent innovations for dating speciation events with the analytical power of species trees, where multilocus data are considered in a coalescent context. Divergence times are estimated in the bird genus Aphelocoma to test whether speciation in these jays coincided with mountain uplift or glacial cycles. Gene trees and species trees show general agreement that diversification began in the Miocene amid mountain uplift. However, dates from the multilocus species tree are more recent, occurring predominately in the Pleistocene, consistent with theory that divergence times can be significantly overestimated with gene-tree based approaches that do not correct for genetic divergence that predates speciation. In addition to coalescent stochasticity, Haldane's rule could account for some differences in timing estimates between mitochondrial DNA and nuclear genes. By incorporating a fossil calibration applied to the species tree, in addition to the process of gene lineage coalescence, the present approach provides a more biologically realistic framework for dating speciation events, and hence for testing the links between diversification and specific biogeographic and geologic events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 3×
“…of BEAST from the standpoint of this study include the ability to (1) calibrate the phylogeny using fossil data for certain nodes, (2) allow substitution rates to vary among branches, and (3) input a prior on the global substitution rate for mtDNA, incorporating error (Drummond et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
Self-citationSanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data.
Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102456 · Cited by 962
Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision
Graur, D., & Martin, W. (2004) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2003.12.003 · Cited by 669
Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages
Brown, J. W., Rest, J. S., García-Moreno, J., Sorenson, M. D., & Mindell, D. P. (2008) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-6 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Bangs, M. R., Douglas, M. R., Mussmann, S. M., & Douglas, M. E. (2018) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1197-y · Cited by 32
Christidis, L., Rheindt, F. E., Iliff, M. J., Lepage, D., Rasmussen, P. C., Donald, P., Alström, P., Areta, J. I., Brammer, F., Chesser, T., et al. (2026) · AviList · doi:10.2173/avilist.v2025b · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCormack, J. E., Heled, J., Delaney, K. S., Peterson, A. T., & Knowles, L. L.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-30
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 184-202
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134207157
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.