Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thinking Fat: Self‐Schemas for Body Weight and the Processing of Weight Relevant Information1

Markus, Hazel, Hamill, Ruth, Sentis, Keith P.·1987·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Self‐schemas pertaining to body weight were investigated for their effects on processing weight‐relevant information. Females who had body weight schemas (Schematics) were compared for their cognitive performance on a variety of tasks with females who did not have such schemas (Aschematics). The function and content of the body weight schema was explored by using stimuli that varied in their conceptual relevance to the schema, including verbal descriptors, body silhouettes, and pictures of food. Both Schematics and Aschematics exhibited a sharp differentiation in their processing of “fat” and “thin” trait adjectives, confirming the hypothesis that all individuals will generate at least a simple structure of thoughts and feelings about their bodies. However, only those individuals with highly developed body weight self‐schemas (Schematics) showed a clear and consistent discrimination in their responses across stimulus domains. It is hypothesized that a body weight self‐schema has both universalistic and particularistic aspects. All individuals have some conception of their body image (universalistic aspect), but there is considerable variation in the way they will process stimuli with reference to body weight. Only those with a particularistic schema will show consistent discriminations in their responses in the body weight domain and will use relevance to one's body weight as a selective mechanism in processing a variety of stimuli.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00292.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Markus, H., Hamill, R., & Sentis, K. P.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
50-71
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2074278953
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking Fat: Self‐Schemas for Body Weight and the Processing of Weight Relevant Information1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00292.x
The paper
Markus, H., Hamill, R., & Sentis, K. P. (1987). Thinking Fat: Self‐Schemas for Body Weight and the Processing of Weight Relevant Information1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00292.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.