“Alkie,”“Frat Brother,” and “Jock”: Perceived Types of College Students and Stereotypes About Drinking1
Abstract
Two studies assessed perceived types of college students and associated stereotypes about drinking. In the first study, 64 university students responded to an open‐ended probe asking them to list types of college students and then rated the amount of drinking done by each of a set of preselected types. In the second study, 236 students responded to the same open‐ended item and directly rated a set of types that had been revised based on Study 1 in terms of drinking and involvement in the academic and sociosexual collegiate subcultures. As hypothesized, consensual responses to the open‐ended probe reflected the college student culture. Also as hypothesized, types of students socially defined in terms of the sociosexual aspects of college (e.g., “fraternity boy”) were rated as likely to drink heavily, whereas types that were seen as being pulled away from college social life, through assumed involvement in academics (e.g., “brain/straight As”), were rated as drinking relatively little. Finally, rated sociosexual involvement was positively correlated, and academic involvement was negatively correlated, with perceived drinking, which supports a central assumption of the framework guiding the research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men's attitudes and values focus on conforming to a particular college male archetype.
“A summation of the attitudes and values for women is that of perfectionism (Landa & Bybee, 2007), while for men, the focus was on conforming to a particular college male archetype (Ashmore et al., 2002).”
From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Ashmore et al., 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013)
(2014) · ASHE Higher Education Report · doi:10.1002/aehe.20012 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Beebe, M.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ashmore, Richard D.
- ORCID
- Beebe, Marc
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 885-907
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W1998112888
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- alcohol consumption, academic engagement, campus social life, student subculture, heavy drinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review