Race and Cognitive‐Ability Test Performance: The Mediating Effects of Test Preparation, Test‐Taking Strategy Use and Self‐Eff icacy
Abstract
Test‐taking strategy use, cognitive‐ability test preparation, and test‐taking self‐efficacy were examined as possible mediators of the relationship between race and cognitiveability test performance. We hypothesized that African Americans would report using fewer test‐taking strategies and less test preparation when compared to White Americans. In addition, we proposed that Afiican Americans would report lower levels of test‐taking self‐efficacy when faced with a cognitive‐ability test. It was expected that these 3 variables would mediate the relationship between race and cognitive‐ability test performance. Using a sample of 170 college students, results indicated that African Americans reported using more ineffective test‐taking strategies, reported participating in more cognitiveability test preparation, and reported higher levels of test‐taking self‐efficacy when compared to White Americans. A portion of the difference in performance on a cognitiveability test between African Americans and White Americans could be attributed to the use of ineffective strategies and test preparation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of ineffective test strategies and test preparation have been found to mediate the relationship between ethnicity and performance.
“The use of ineffective test strategies and test preparation have been found to mediate the relationship between ethnicity and performance (Ellis & Ryan, 2003)”
From Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Ellis & Ryan, 2003
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 8,181 · see citing works
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review
Cuppello, S., Zibarras, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2025) · Trends in Psychology · doi:10.1007/s43076-025-00504-5
- Authors
- ELLIS, A. P. J., & RYAN, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- ELLIS, ALEKSANDER P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2607-2629
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2162863484
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- race, cognitive ability tests, test performance, test-taking strategies, exam preparation, self-efficacy, African Americans, White Americans, racial differences, mediating effect, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review