The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology
Abstract
Although research on plant volatiles and pollination ecology has grown explosively over the past 15 years, there remains little dialogue between these fields. Here I examine the historical and cultural reasons for this impasse, focusing on the ways that questions in each field are addressed, and the potential for productive cross‐talk. The specialization–generalization debate in pollination has cast doubt on the importance of sensory biology in mediating plant–pollinator interactions on the community scale. However, chemical ‘filters’ of volatile or nectar‐borne repellents are likely to explain the absence of specific interactions in plant–pollinator webs. In addition, the omission of plant volatiles from path analyses measuring the relative impacts of herbivores and pollinators on plant fitness may be one reason for large unexplained variance terms in such models. Floral scent functions in concert with visual and gustatory cues by attracting pollinators from a distance, increasing approaches and landings, and mediating outcrossing rates through changes in visitation frequency and duration. All dimensions of floral chemistry, including ontogenetic and diel variation in scent emissions, have the potential to respond to balancing selection between herbivores and pollinators. The available data reveal that chemical aspects of floral phenotypes are important across the specialization–generalization spectrum, and thus are widely applicable to mainstream pollination ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
Wake Up and Smell the Roses: The Ecology and Evolution of Floral Scent
Raguso, R. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095601 · Cited by 889
Self-citationField Experiments with Transformed Plants Reveal the Sense of Floral Scents
Kessler, D., Gase, K., & Baldwin, I. T. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1160072 · Cited by 366
Real-time divergent evolution in plants driven by pollinators
Gervasi, D. D. L., & Schiestl, F. P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14691 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Raguso, R. A.
- Venue
- Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-19
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 196-207
- ISSN
- 0013-8703 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-7458
- OpenAlex
- W1967964319
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00683.x
- The paper
- Raguso, R. A. (2008). Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00683.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.