The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience1
Abstract
Anorectal manometry includes a number of specific tests that are helpful in the diagnostic assessment of patients with fecal incontinence and constipation; their purpose is to delineate the pathophysiological mechanism for these symptoms. Some of these tests may also provide helpful information in the assessment of patients with rectal pain or diarrhea, but their sensitivity and specificity are less well established for these symptoms. Tests for which there is consensus regarding their clinical utility include 1) resting anal canal pressure, 2) anal canal squeeze pressure (peak pressure and duration), 3) the rectoanal inhibitory reflex elicited by balloon distension of the rectum, 4) anal canal pressure in response to a cough, 5) anal canal pressure in response to defecatory maneuvers, 6) simulated defecation by means of balloon or radiopaque contrast, 7) compliance of the rectum in response to balloon distension, and 8) sensory thresholds in response to balloon distension. Anal endosonography and pelvic floor electromyography from intra-anal plate electrodes are nonmanometric tests that are also specifically useful in the evaluation of constipation and fecal incontinence. The clinical utility of all anorectal manometric tests is limited by the relative absence of 1) standardization of test protocols and 2) normative data from a large number of healthy individuals. The interpretation of these diagnostic tests is also complicated by the fact that patients are able to compensate for deficits in specific physiological mechanisms maintaining continence and defecation by utilizing other biological and behavioral mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for exacerbation of irritable bowel syndrome during menses
Whitehead, W. E., Cheskin, L. J., Heller, B. R., Robinson, J. C., Crowell, M. D., Benjamin, C., & Schuster, M. M. (1990) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(90)91079-l · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Cited by
Carrington, E. V., Heinrich, H., Knowles, C. H., Fox, M., Rao, S., Altomare, D. F., Bharucha, A. E., Burgell, R., Chey, W. D., Chiarioni, G., et al. (2020) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13679 · Cited by 325
Self-citationMinimum standards of anorectal manometry
Rao, S. S. C., Azpiroz, F., Diamant, N., Enck, P., Tougas, G., & Wald, A. (2002) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00352.x · Cited by 310
Self-citationSerra, J., Pohl, D., Azpiroz, F., Chiarioni, G., Ducrotté, P., Gourcerol, G., Hungin, A. P. S., Layer, P., Mendive, J., Pfeifer, J., et al. (2020) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13762 · Cited by 244
Self-citationFundamentals of Neurogastroenterology: Physiology/Motility – Sensation
Boeckxstaens, G., Camilleri, M., Sifrim, D., Houghton, L. A., Elsenbruch, S., Lindberg, G., Azpiroz, F., & Parkman, H. P. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.030 · Cited by 142
Self-citationAzpiroz, F., & Malagelada, J. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.062 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Azpiroz, F., Enck, P., & Whitehead, W. E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232-240
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2077152656
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05450.x
- The paper
- Azpiroz, F., Enck, P., & Whitehead, W. E. (2002). Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience1. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05450.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.