The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Welfare impacts of maize–pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania
Abstract
This article examines the driving forces behind farmers’ decisions to adopt improved pigeonpea and maize and estimates the causal impact of technology adoption on household welfare using data obtained from a random cross‐section sample of 613 small‐scale farmers in Tanzania. We use seemingly unrelated and recursive bivariate probit regressions to test the endogeneity and joint decision making of pigeonpea–maize production. A double hurdle model is used to analyze the determinants of the intensity of technology adoption conditional on overcoming seed access constraints. To address the impact of adoption on welfare, the article employs both propensity score matching and switching regression techniques. Results from bivariate probit models show that unobservable factors cause both decisions to be correlated but the finding does not support the conjecture that both decisions are made jointly. Overall the analysis of the determinants of adoption identifies inadequate local supply of seed, access to information, human capital, and access to private productive asset as key constraints for pigeonpea technology adoption. The causal impact estimation from both the propensity score matching and switching regression suggests that maize/pigeonpea adoption has a positive and significant impact on income and consumption expenditure among sample households.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Kleemann, L., & Abdulai, A. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.017 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2014) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.90.1.26 · Cited by 623
Takahashi, K., Muraoka, R., & Otsuka, K. (2020) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12539 · Cited by 444
Analysis of Adoption and Impacts of Improved Maize Varieties in Eastern Zambia
Khonje, M., Manda, J., Alene, A. D., & Kassie, M. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.008 · Cited by 414
Kleemann, L., & Abdulai, A. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.017 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Amare, M., Asfaw, S., & Shiferaw, B.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-31
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-43
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-0862
- OpenAlex
- W1966525182
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Welfare impacts of maize–pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00563.x
- The paper
- Amare, M., Asfaw, S., & Shiferaw, B. (2012). Welfare impacts of maize–pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00563.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.