Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Evaluation of methods for extraction of bacteria from soil

Open access
Viggo Lindahl, Lars Reier Bakken·1995·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

Several methods for dispersion of soil were tested for possible use in procedures for extraction of bacteria. Physical cell damage on cells and efficiency in extraction of indigenous cells from soil, were investigated. Cell damage by the dispersion methods was investigated by measuring the physical cell integrity and viability of pure cultures of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, as well as soil bacteria extracted from soil, when dispersed in slurries of γ-sterilized soil. Separation of bacteria and soil particles on the basis of buoyant density was conducted with the nonionic density gradient medium Nycodenz. When slurries of γ-sterilized soil with added pure cultured cells were centrifuged (10000 × g) over cushions of Nycodenz (1.3 g ml−1), practically all the added cells were recovered in a layer on top of the cushion. This proves that a reversible attachment and cosedimentation is not an important phenomenon in this procedure. The efficiency of the different dispersion methods for the extraction of indigenous soil bacteria, was assessed after separation of dislodged and attached soil bacteria. This separation was done either on the basis of sedimentation rate by low speed centrifugation, or buoyant density by Nycodenz density gradient centrifugation. The physical dispersion by ultrasonic treatment and chemical dispersion by the use of a chelating agent together with a detergent, were inferior to physical dispersion either by Waring blender (for large volumes) or a rotating rubber pestle treatment (for smaller volumes). The physical dispersion did not appear to be destructive to the cells tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1016/0168-6496(94)00077-a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Lindahl, V., & Bakken, L. R.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
1995-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
135-142
ISSN
0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113102245
Cited by
241
References
0
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of methods for extraction of bacteria from soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0168-6496(94)00077-a
The paper
Lindahl, V., & Bakken, L. R. (1995). Evaluation of methods for extraction of bacteria from soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496(94)00077-a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.