The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard: Bacterial characterization of an Arctic snow cover
Open accessAbstract
A sampling campaign was organized during spring 2004 in Spitzberg, Svalbard, in the area around the scientific base of Ny-Alesund, to characterize the snow pack bacterial population. Total bacteria counts were established by 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in the seasonal snow pack bordering the sea. On the sea shore, bacterial concentration was about 6 x 10(4) cells mL(-1), without any significant variation according to depth. In the accumulation snow layer of the glacier, concentrations were about 2 x 10(4 )cells mL(-1), except in the 2003 summer layer, where it reached 2 x 10(5) cells mL(-1), as the result of cell multiplication allowed by higher temperature and snow melting. Strains isolated from the seasonal snow pack were identified from their 16S rRNA gene sequences, and lodged in GenBank. They belong to the Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. They are closely related to cold environment bacteria, as revealed by phylogenetic tree constructions, and two appear to be of unknown affiliation. Using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, it was shown that these isolates have the capacity to degrade organic compounds found in Arctic snow (propionate, acetate and formate), and this can allow them to develop when snow melts, and thus to be actively involved in snow chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review
Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A. S., Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., et al. (2012) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 · Cited by 1,500
Hodson, A., Anesio, A. M., Tranter, M., Fountain, A., Osborn, M., Priscu, J., Laybourn-Parry, J., & Sattler, B. (2008) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/07-0187.1 · Cited by 528
Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms
Margesin, R., & Miteva, V. (2011) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.12.004 · Cited by 518
Seasonal Variability in Bacterial and Fungal Diversity of the Near-Surface Atmosphere
Bowers, R. M., Clements, N., Emerson, J. B., Wiedinmyer, C., Hannigan, M. P., & Fierer, N. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402970s · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Amato, P., Hennebelle, R., Magand, O., Sancelme, M., Delort, A.-M., Barbante, C., Boutron, C., & Ferrari, C.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-264
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W1905341549
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard: Bacterial characterization of an Arctic snow cover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00198.x
- The paper
- Amato, P., Hennebelle, R., Magand, O., Sancelme, M., Delort, A.-M., Barbante, C., Boutron, C., & Ferrari, C. (2007). Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard: Bacterial characterization of an Arctic snow cover. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00198.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.