Cited by 48Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionGut microbiota and healthRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Molecular profiling and identification of methanogenic archaeal species from rabbit caecum: New methanogens from rabbit caecum

Open access
Kušar, Darja, Avguštin, Gorazd·2010·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

During a comparison of 16S rDNA PCR-denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of methanogenic archaea from rumen fluid, rabbit caecum and pig feces, a unique band common to all rabbit caecum samples was observed. DGGE profiling also showed that the methanogen community from the New Zealand White adult rabbits is different and less complex than the methanogen communities from the rumen and pig feces. Small subunit ribosomal gene sequences of methanogenic archaea were subsequently retrieved from the constructed rabbit caecum 16S rDNA gene library. Results of the phylogenetic analysis indicated that rabbit caecum is inhabited by members of the genus Methanobrevibacter and is possibly one-species dominated, because all the retrieved sequences exhibited similarity values of 99% or higher. This species may well be a novel species of the genus Methanobrevibacter. It belongs to a distinct phylogenetic group containing Methanobrevibacter woesei, Methanobrevibacter thaueri and Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii strains isolated from animal feces, and Methanobrevibacter smithii from the predominating methanogen population of the human large bowel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00980.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kušar, D., & Avguštin, G.
Affiliations
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Avguštin, Gorazd
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2010-10-15
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
623-630
ISSN
0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1753469818
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
methanogenic archaea, Methanobrevibacter, 16S rRNA gene, small subunit rRNA, rumen, pig feces, new species, phylogenetic analysis, molecular profiling, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cecum, Phylogeny, Rabbits, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Archaeal, Methanobrevibacter, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review