Cited by 200Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyBacillus and Francisella bacterial research

Molecular epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica infections

Open access
Fredriksson-Ahomaa, Maria, Stolle, Andreas, Korkeala, Hannu·2006·FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology

Abstract

Yersinia enterocolitica is an important food-borne pathogen that can cause yersiniosis in humans and animals. The epidemiology of Y. enterocolitica infections is complex and remains poorly understood. Most cases of yersiniosis occur sporadically without an apparent source. The main sources of human infection are assumed to be pork and pork products, as pigs are a major reservoir of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. However, no clear evidence shows that such a transmission route exists. Using PCR, the detection rate of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in raw pork products is high, which reinforces the assumption that these products are a transmission link between pigs and humans. Several different DNA-based methods have been used to characterize Y. enterocolitica strains. However, the high genetic similarity between strains and the predominating genotypes within the bio- and serotype have limited the benefit of these methods in epidemiological studies. Similar DNA patterns have been obtained among human and pig strains of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, corroborating the view that pigs are an important source of human yersiniosis. Indistinguishable genotypes have also been found between human strains and dog, cat, sheep and wild rodent strains, indicating that these animals are other possible infection sources for humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-695x.2006.00095.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improper handling of contaminated meat (including pig offal) is thought to be a major risk for human yersiniosis, whilst a minor proportion of cases may derive from contact with pets.

    “Therefore, improper handling of contaminated meat (including pig offal) is thought to be a major risk for human yersiniosis, whilst a minor proportion of cases may derive from contact with pets (Fredriksson‐Ahomaa et al. 2006).”

    From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Fredriksson‐Ahomaa et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., Stolle, A., & Korkeala, H.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
Published
2006-08
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
315-329
ISSN
  • 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-695X
OpenAlex
W1994844887
Cited by
200
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Keywords
Yersinia enterocolitica, yersiniosis, molecular epidemiology, foodborne transmission, pork products, pigs as reservoir, zoonotic transmission, strain genotyping, DNA fingerprinting, wild rodents, dogs and cats
MeSH terms
Animals, Food Microbiology, Humans, Meat, Serotyping, Swine, Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia Infections, Molecular Epidemiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review