The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity of the major staphylococcal autolysin Atl
Abstract
The major autolysin of Staphylococcus aureus (AtlA) and of Staphylococcus epidermidis (AtlE) are well-studied enzymes. Here we created an atlA deletion mutant in S. aureus that formed large cell clusters and was biofilm-negative. In electron micrographs, the mutant cells were distinguished by rough outer cell surface. The mutant could be complemented using the atlE gene from S. epidermidis. To study the role of the repetitive sequences of atlE, we expressed in Escherichia coli the amidase domain encoded by the gene, carrying no repeat regions (amiE) or two repeat regions (amiE-R1,2), or the three repeat regions alone (R1,2,3) as N-terminal His-tag fusion proteins. Only slight differences in the cell wall lytic activity between AmiE and AmiE-R1,2 were observed. The repetitive sequences exhibit a good binding affinity to isolated peptidoglycan and might contribute to the targeting of the amidase to the substrate. AmiE and AmiE-R1,2 have a broad substrate specificity as shown by similar activities with peptidoglycan lacking wall teichoic acid, O-acetylation, or both. As the amidase activity of AtlA and AtlE has not been proved biochemically, we used purified AmiE-R1,2 to determine the exact peptidoglycan cleavage site. We provide the first evidence that the amidase indeed cleaves the amide bond between N-acetyl muramic acid and L-alanine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heilmann, C., Hussain, M., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x · Cited by 700
Self-citation
Cited by
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · Cited by 963
Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus
McCarthy, H., Rudkin, J. K., Black, N. S., Gallagher, L., O'Neill, E., & O'Gara, J. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 · Cited by 426
Are coagulase-negative staphylococci virulent?
Heilmann, C., Ziebuhr, W., & Becker, K. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.012 · Cited by 298
Inhibition of staphylococcal biofilm formation by nitrite
Schlag, S., Nerz, C., Birkenstock, T. A., Altenberend, F., & Götz, F. (2007) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00598-07 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Biswas, R., Voggu, L., Simon, U. K., Hentschel, P., Thumm, G., & Götz, F.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 259
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-268
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6968
- OpenAlex
- W1964424377
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity of the major staphylococcal autolysin Atl. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00281.x
- The paper
- Biswas, R., Voggu, L., Simon, U. K., Hentschel, P., Thumm, G., & Götz, F. (2006). Activity of the major staphylococcal autolysin Atl. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00281.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.