The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interactions between biofilms and the environment
Open accessAbstract
The surfaces of bacteria are highly interactive with their environment. Whether the bacterium is Gram-negative or Gram-positive, most surfaces are charged at neutral pH because of the ionization of the reactive chemical groups which stud them. Since prokaryotes have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, this can have surprising ramifications. For example, many bacteria can concentrate dilute environmental metals on their surfaces and initiate the development of fine-grained minerals. In natural environments, it is not unusual to find such bacteria closely associated with the minerals which they have helped develop. Bacteria can be free-living (planktonic), but in most natural ecosystems they prefer to grow on interfaces as biofilms; supposedly to take advantage of the nutrient concentrative effect of the interface, although there must also be gained some protective value against predators and toxic agents. Using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa model system, we have determined that lipopolysaccharide is important in the initial attachment of this Gram-negative bacterium to interfaces and that this surface moiety subtly changes during biofilm formation. Using this same model system, we have also discovered that there is a natural tendency for Gram-negative bacteria to concentrate and package periplasmic components into membrane vesicles which bleb-off the surface. Since some of these components (e.g., peptidoglycan hydrolases) can degrade other surrounding cells, the vesicles could be predatory; i.e., a natural system by which neighboring bacteria are targeted and lysed, thereby liberating additional nutrients to the microbial community. This obviously would be of benefit to vesicle-producing bacteria living in biofilms containing mixed microbial populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Outer-membrane vesicles from Gram-negative bacteria: biogenesis and functions
Schwechheimer, C., & Kuehn, M. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3525 · Cited by 1,922
Structures of Gram-Negative Cell Walls and Their Derived Membrane Vesicles
Beveridge, T. J. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.16.4725-4733.1999 · Cited by 1,528
Self-citationStaphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease
Archer, N. K., Mazaitis, M. J., Costerton, J. W., Leid, J. G., Powers, M. E., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2011) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 · Cited by 1,018
Gu, J.-D. (2003) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/s0964-8305(02)00177-4 · Cited by 819
What are Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances?
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R., & Flemming, H.-C. (1999) · Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60147-7_1 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Beveridge, T.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 291-303
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082668953
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between biofilms and the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00012-0
- The paper
- Beveridge, T. (1997). Interactions between biofilms and the environment. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00012-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.