The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi
Open accessAbstract
Cellulose is the main polymeric component of the plant cell wall, the most abundant polysaccharide on Earth, and an important renewable resource. Basidiomycetous fungi belong to its most potent degraders because many species grow on dead wood or litter, in environment rich in cellulose. Fungal cellulolytic systems differ from the complex cellulolytic systems of bacteria. For the degradation of cellulose, basidiomycetes utilize a set of hydrolytic enzymes typically composed of endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase and beta-glucosidase. In some species, the absence of cellobiohydrolase is substituted by the production of processive endoglucanases combining the properties of both of these enzymes. In addition, systems producing hydroxyl radicals based on cellobiose dehydrogenase, quinone redox cycling or glycopeptide-based Fenton reaction are involved in the degradation of several plant cell wall components, including cellulose. The complete cellulolytic complex used by a single fungal species is typically composed of more than one of the above mechanisms that contribute to the utilization of cellulose as a source of carbon or energy or degrade it to ensure fast substrate colonization. The efficiency and regulation of cellulose degradation differs among wood-rotting, litter-decomposing, mycorrhizal or plant pathogenic fungi and yeasts due to the different roles of cellulose degradation in the physiology and ecology of the individual groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pecking Order of Free Radicals and Antioxidants: Lipid Peroxidation, α-Tocopherol, and Ascorbate
Buettner, G. R. (1993) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1006/abbi.1993.1074 · Cited by 2,417
Cited by
Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution
Janusz, G., Pawlik, A., Sulej, J., Świderska-Burek, U., Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A., & Paszczyński, A. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux049 · Cited by 984
Martinez, D., Challacombe, J., Morgenstern, I., Hibbett, D., Schmoll, M., Kubicek, C. P., Ferreira, P., Ruiz-Duenas, F. J., Martinez, A. T., Kersten, P., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809575106 · Cited by 580
Fungal biodegradation and enzymatic modification of lignin.
(2010) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 524
Chaturvedi, V., & Verma, P. (2013) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-013-0167-8 · Cited by 485
López-Mondéjar, R., Zühlke, D., Becher, D., Riedel, K., & Baldrian, P. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep25279 · Cited by 482
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldrian, P., & Valášková, V.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 501-521
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W1681833908
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00106.x
- The paper
- Baldrian, P., & Valášková, V. (2008). Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00106.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.