Deregulation of keratinocyte differentiation and activation: a hallmark of venous ulcers
Open accessAbstract
Epidermal morphology of chronic wounds differs from that of normal epidermis. Biopsies of non‐healing edges obtained from patients with venous ulcers show thick and hyperproliferative epidermis with mitosis present in suprabasal layers. This epidermis is also hyper‐keratotic and parakeratotic. This suggests incomplete activation and differentiation of keratinocytes. To identify molecular changes that lead to pathogenic alterations in keratinocyte activation and differentiation pathways we isolated mRNA from non‐healing edges deriving from venous ulcers patients and determined transcriptional profiles using Affymetrix chips. Obtained transcriptional profiles were compared to those from healthy, unwounded skin. As previously indicated by histology, we found deregulation of differentiation and activation markers. We also found differential regulation of signalling molecules that regulate these two processes. Early differentiation markers, keratins K1/K10 and a subset of small proline‐rich proteins, along with the late differentiation marker filaggrin were suppressed, whereas late differentiation markers involucrin, transgultaminase 1 and another subset of small proline‐rich proteins were induced in ulcers when compared to healthy skin. Surprisingly, desomosomal and tight junction components were also deregulated. Keratinocyte activation markers keratins K6/K16/K17 were induced. We conclude that keratinocytes at the non‐healing edges of venous ulcers do not execute either activation or differentiation pathway, resulting in thick callus‐like formation at the edge of a venous ulcers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genomic, proteomic, and lipidomic analyses of human wounds have improved understanding of mechanisms guiding repair and impairment and identified potential biomarkers such as c-myc, β-catenin, S100 proteins, MMPs, and glycerophosphocholines, glycerophosphoglycerols, glycerophosphoinositols, and triacylglycerols.
“For example, genomic, proteomic, and lipidomic analyses of human wounds have already improved our understanding of the mechanisms that guide the repair process and its impairment, and have identified several potential biomarkers, such as c-myc and β-catenin (7, 178), S100 proteins and MMPs (48), or glycerophosphocholines, glycerophosphoglycerols, glycerophosphoinositols, and triacylglycerols (181”
From Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation (2014) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Stojadinovic, O., Pastar, I., Vukelic, S., Mahoney, M. G., Brennan, D., Krzyzanowska, A., Golinko, M., Brem, H., & Tomic‐Canic, M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tomic‐Canic, Marjana
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6b
- Pages
- 2675-2690
- ISSN
- 1582-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1582-4934
- PMC
- PMC3828883
- OpenAlex
- W1996740089
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DK59424)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NR08029, R01NR008029)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK59424, K08DK059424)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM 008443, R01LM008443)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
- Keywords
- venous ulcers, keratinocyte differentiation, keratinocyte activation, chronic wounds, gene expression profiling, keratin, small proline-rich proteins, filaggrin, involucrin, transglutaminase 1, desmosomes, tight junctions, epidermal hyperproliferation, hyperkeratosis
- MeSH terms
- Filaggrin Proteins, Cell Differentiation, Desmosomes, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Keratins, Varicose Ulcer, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Keratinocytes, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Proliferation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review