Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SOME COMMENTS ON THE PYRAMIDAL TRACT, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS IN MAN

Nyberg-Hansen, Rolf, Rinvik, Eric·1963·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

It has for a long time been generally accepted that a lesion of the pyramidal tract usually results in a spastic hemiplegia, characterized by impairment of skilled voluntary movements, increased myotatic (deep or tendon) rcflcxes, and weakened or abolished cutaneous reflexes with an extensor plantar response. However, after sectioning the middle third of the ccrebral peduncle in man containing the pyramidal tract fibres scvcral authors have reported that there is no, or only a slight and transient, spasticity and that the capacity to perform skilled voluntary moverncnts is only nioderately impaired ( WaIker 1849, W h i f e 1050, Bzicy 1857, Bucy & Keplinger 1961). These observations lctl Rucy to ask “Is there a pyramidal tract?”, and to suggest that cortical impulscs responsible for the production of skilled voluntary movements might take an “extrapyramidal” routc. Although symptomatological variations which may be seen following lesions supposed to involve the pyramidal tract infantile hemiplegia included may be due to concomitant damage to “extrapyramidal” structures, a problem to which we will briefly return in the final section of this paper, the question has often been raised whether such variations are due to a greater or lesser extent to individual morphological variations of the pyramidal tract. The chief purpose of the present paper is to review what is known of individual variations of this fibre system in man with regard to the following items : decussation of fibres, aberrant fibres, number and size of fibres and myelination of fibres. For a proper discussion of this, certain relevant data on the anatomy of the pyramidal tract have to be considered as well. Only few systematical studies on the individual variations of this fibre system in man have, however, been made. The data on which this review is based are, therefore, largely collcctcd from clinical case reports in the literature. Where it is relevant, data from other species will be considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1963.tb05384.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Nyberg-Hansen, R., & Rinvik, E.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
1963-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
1-30
ISSN
  • 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0404
OpenAlex
W2141057871
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOME COMMENTS ON THE PYRAMIDAL TRACT, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS IN MAN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1963.tb05384.x
The paper
Nyberg-Hansen, R., & Rinvik, E. (1963). SOME COMMENTS ON THE PYRAMIDAL TRACT, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS IN MAN. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1963.tb05384.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.