Coping with multiple sclerosis: a 5-year follow-up study
Abstract
Objectives To examine how coping styles among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) change over time and how patients' coping styles after 5 years are associated with disability pension. Materials and methods Seventy-six MS patients and 94 healthy controls were included in this study. The patients were examined at baseline and 5 years later. This included a neurological examination and information on disability pension and a questionnaire assessing coping (the COPE scale). Controls were registered at baseline only. Results Compared to healthy controls, MS patients were more passive in coping with disease related distress. This was even more pronounced 5 years later. Disability pensioned patients employed more social support, venting of emotions and behavioural disengagement at follow-up. Conclusion This study shows that patients with MS employ coping styles that may be inadequate and this is not improved by adaption over time. Although patients also use strategies to enhance their lives, these findings suggest that there may be a potential for improving the lives of patients with MS through interventions that may enhance adequate coping with the disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies.
“several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; [26]), is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies [22,23,27,28].”
From Coping strategies and their impact on quality of life and physical disability of people with multiple sclerosis (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Lode, K., Bru, E., Klevan, G., Myhr, K. M., Nyland, H., & Larsen, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
- University of Stavanger (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Lode, K.
- Venue
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 336-42
- ISSN
- 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0404
- OpenAlex
- W2086428256
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, coping styles, disability pension, COPE scale, social support, behavioral disengagement, passive coping, coping interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Social Support, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review