Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Survival, prognostic factors, and repeat surgery in GBM patients

Open access
Helseth, R., Helseth, E., Johannesen, T. B., Langberg, C. W., Lote, K., Rønning, P., Scheie, D., Vik, A., Meling, T. R.·2010·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Helseth R, Helseth E, Johannesen TB, Langberg CW, Lote K, Rønning P, Scheie D, Vik A, Meling TR. Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Acta Neurol Scand: 122: 159–167.© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objectives – To study overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Material and methods– Retrospective study of 516 consecutive adult patients who underwent primary surgery for a GBM in year 2003–2008. Results – Median age at primary surgery was 63.7 years (range 18.0–88.0). Median OS was 9.9 months. Age >60 years, poor preoperative ECOG score, bilateral tumor, biopsy rather than resection, and no temozolomide chemoradiotherapy were negative risk factors. Repeat surgery was performed in 65 patients (13%). Median time between first and second surgery was 7 months. Indications for second surgery were increasing neurological deficits (35.4%), raised ICP (33.8%), asymptomatic but reoperated because of tumor progression verified on MRI (20.0%), and epileptic seizures (11%). Patients who underwent repeated surgery had longer OS; 18.4 months vs 8.6 months (P < 0.001). Conclusions – OS for adult GBM patients was 9.9 months. Negative prognostic factors were increasing age, poor neurological function, bilateral tumor involvement, biopsy instead of resection, and RT alone compared to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy. Our rate of repeated surgery for GBM was 13% and the main indications for second surgery were raised ICP and increasing neurological deficits. In a carefully selected group of patients, repeat surgery significantly prolongs OS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01350.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Helseth, R., Helseth, E., Johannesen, T. B., Langberg, C. W., Lote, K., Rønning, P., Scheie, D., Vik, A., & Meling, T. R.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
2010-03-18
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
159-167
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1506994362
Cited by
215
References
2
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Survival, prognostic factors, and repeat surgery in GBM patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01350.x
The paper
Helseth, R., Helseth, E., Johannesen, T. B., Langberg, C. W., Lote, K., Rønning, P., Scheie, D., Vik, A., & Meling, T. R. (2010). Overall survival, prognostic factors, and repeated surgery in a consecutive series of 516 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Survival, prognostic factors, and repeat surgery in GBM patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01350.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.