Cited by 39Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesBone health and osteoporosis research

Fractures and falls in patients with newly diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Moen, S. M., Celius, E. G., Nordsletten, L., Holmøy, T.·2011·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background Increased risk of falls and reduced bone strength may both contribute to enhanced fracture risk in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Fall tendency and fractures have not been investigated in newly diagnosed patients. Objectives The aim was to compare the fall tendency and fracture risk in a cohort of newly diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and MS patients with that in the general population. Methods We performed a population-based case-control study in Oslo of self-reported fall tendency and fracture history in consecutive patients diagnosed with either a CIS suggestive of demyelinating disease or MS between January 2005 and January 2008. Two age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control groups were included; one group from the population registry and one group recruited by the patients. Results Ninety-nine patients (mean time since the first symptom 1.6 ± 1.3 years, mean expanded disability status scale [EDSS] score 1.4 ± 1.1) and 159 controls were included. Whereas no difference in the number of fractures was reported, 20% of the patients and 3% of the controls reported a tendency to fall (P Conclusions Fall tendency may occur early in the disease course of MS, before impairment of locomotion and balance becomes evident on clinical examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01548.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moen, S. M., Celius, E. G., Nordsletten, L., & Holmøy, T.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Moen, S. M.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
124
Issue
191
Pages
79-82
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524510706
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Biogen
  • IC Design Education Center
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, falls, fracture risk, bone strength, disability, Expanded Disability Status Scale, early disease course, balance disorders
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adult, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurologic Examination, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Disease Progression, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review