A medical approach to management of spontaneous abortion using misoprostol: Extending misoprostol treatment to a maximum of 48 hours can further improve evacuation of retained products of conception in spontaneous abortion
Open accessAbstract
Background. To compare a 48 hour non surgical policy in the management of spontaneous abortion with a policy of routine, universal uterine curettage. Methods. A prospective, observational study on 354 women admitted to hospital with spontaneous abortion. Of these, 225 who had retained products of conception were treated with misoprostol for up to 48 hours after 101 were excluded because they had an empty uterus on transvaginal scan (TVS) and another 28 women because they were unsuitable for conservative management. Follow‐up was conducted over a 3 week period to assess morbidity. A reference group of 137 women, all of whom had an evacuation of retained products of cenception (ERPC) as a routine after they had a TVS documenting retained products of conception (POCs), was used for comparison. Results. Evacuation of the uterus occurred within 24 hours in 107 women and in 148 at 48 hours after misoprostol treatment was started. There were three uterine curettages up to 14 days after discharge from hospital for persistent bleeding and two cases of pelvic infection. An ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed at follow‐up in one woman. In the reference group, there were nine women who had complications, four requiring another ERPC and five had infection, an overall complication rate of 6.6% in the reference group and 1.7 % in the protocol treatment group. Conclusion A 48 hour regimen using transvaginal ultrasound and misoprostol for the management of spontaneous abortion was successful in avoiding surgery in 249 out of a possible 354 (70.6″ i) women with spontaneous abortion, with a low rate of subsequent morbidity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For medical management, the success of the treatment protocol was disappointing compared with the higher success rates in the observational studies on which we based the treatment protocol and other observational studies.
“For medical management, the success of the treatment protocol was disappointing compared with the higher success rates in the observational studies on which we based the treatment protocol and other observational studies.19,24”
From Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial) (2006) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trinder, J., Brocklehurst, P., Porter, R., Read, M., Vyas, S., & Smith, L. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38828.593125.55 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
You, J. H. S., & Chung, T. K. H. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei163 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chung, T., Leung, P., Cheung, L. P., Haines, C., & Chang, A. M. Z.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Prince of Wales Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chung, Tony
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 248-251
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2601049627
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- miscarriage, misoprostol, retained products of conception, uterine curettage, transvaginal ultrasound, expectant management, non-surgical management, postpartum complications, pelvic infection, ectopic pregnancy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review