Cited by 41Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and Medication Impact

A medical approach to management of spontaneous abortion using misoprostol: Extending misoprostol treatment to a maximum of 48 hours can further improve evacuation of retained products of conception in spontaneous abortion

Open access
Chung, Tony, Leung, Peter, Cheung, Lai Ping, Haines, Christopher, Chang, Allan M Z·1997·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background. To compare a 48 hour non surgical policy in the management of spontaneous abortion with a policy of routine, universal uterine curettage. Methods. A prospective, observational study on 354 women admitted to hospital with spontaneous abortion. Of these, 225 who had retained products of conception were treated with misoprostol for up to 48 hours after 101 were excluded because they had an empty uterus on transvaginal scan (TVS) and another 28 women because they were unsuitable for conservative management. Follow‐up was conducted over a 3 week period to assess morbidity. A reference group of 137 women, all of whom had an evacuation of retained products of cenception (ERPC) as a routine after they had a TVS documenting retained products of conception (POCs), was used for comparison. Results. Evacuation of the uterus occurred within 24 hours in 107 women and in 148 at 48 hours after misoprostol treatment was started. There were three uterine curettages up to 14 days after discharge from hospital for persistent bleeding and two cases of pelvic infection. An ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed at follow‐up in one woman. In the reference group, there were nine women who had complications, four requiring another ERPC and five had infection, an overall complication rate of 6.6% in the reference group and 1.7 % in the protocol treatment group. Conclusion A 48 hour regimen using transvaginal ultrasound and misoprostol for the management of spontaneous abortion was successful in avoiding surgery in 249 out of a possible 354 (70.6″ i) women with spontaneous abortion, with a low rate of subsequent morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1997.tb07854.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, T., Leung, P., Cheung, L. P., Haines, C., & Chang, A. M. Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Prince of Wales Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Chung, Tony
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-03
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
248-251
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2601049627
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
miscarriage, misoprostol, retained products of conception, uterine curettage, transvaginal ultrasound, expectant management, non-surgical management, postpartum complications, pelvic infection, ectopic pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review