Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of fluoxetine on anxiety and depression symptoms in cancer patients

Razavi, D., Allilaire, J.‐F., Smith, M., Salimpour, A., Verra, M., Desclaux, B., Saltel, P., Piollet, I., Gauvain‐Piquard, A., Trichard, C., Cordier, B., Fresco, R., Guillibert, E., Sechter, D., Orth, J.‐P., Bouhassira, M., Mesters, P., Blin, P.·1996·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Little has been done to study the effectiveness of antidepressants in controlling anxiety/depression in a population of cancer patients. A double‐blind placebo‐controlled study was therefore designed to assess the effectiveness of 20 mg fluoxetine. Of 115 cancer patients who fulfilled entry criteria for levels of distress, 45 patients were randomized to a fluoxetine treatment group (FA) and 46 patients to a placebo group (PA) after a 1‐week placebo period designed to exclude placebo responders. The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Revised Symptom Checklist (SCL90‐R) and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQOLI) were used to assess the efficacy of fluoxetine. The response rate, defined by a HADS score lower than 8 after 5 weeks of treatment, was not significantly higher in the FA group (11%) compared to the PA group (7%). Compared to the PA group, patients in the FA group showed a significantly greater decrease in SCL90‐R mean total score after 5 weeks, but not a greater decrease in HADS mean score. No difference between the two groups was found in observer‐reported assessments (MADRS, HAS and SQOLI). Significantly more drop‐outs were observed in the FA group (n=15) than in the PA group (n=7), although the frequencies of side‐effects were not significantly different.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09850.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Razavi, D., Allilaire, J. ‐., Smith, M., Salimpour, A., Verra, M., Desclaux, B., Saltel, P., Piollet, I., Gauvain‐Piquard, A., Trichard, C., Cordier, B., Fresco, R., Guillibert, E., Sechter, D., Orth, J. ‐., Bouhassira, M., Mesters, P., & Blin, P.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
205-210
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W1995415250
Cited by
161
References
3
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of fluoxetine on anxiety and depression symptoms in cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09850.x
The paper
Razavi, D., Allilaire, J. ‐., Smith, M., Salimpour, A., Verra, M., Desclaux, B., Saltel, P., Piollet, I., Gauvain‐Piquard, A., Trichard, C., Cordier, B., Fresco, R., Guillibert, E., Sechter, D., Orth, J. ‐., Bouhassira, M., Mesters, P., & Blin, P. (1996). The effect of fluoxetine on anxiety and depression symptoms in cancer patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09850.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.