Standardized remission criteria in schizophrenia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent work has focussed on schizophrenia as a 'deficit' state but little attention has been paid to defining illness plasticity in terms of symptomatic remission. METHOD: A qualitative review of a recently proposed concept of remission [N.C. Andreasen, W.T. Carpenter Jr, J.M. Kane, R.A. Lasser, S.R. Marder, D.R. Weinberger (2005) Am J Psychiatry 162: 441] is presented. RESULTS: The proposed definition of remission is conceptually viable, and can be easily implemented in clinical trials and clinical practice. Its increasing acceptance may reset expectations of treatment to a higher level, improve documentation of clinical status and facilitate dialogue on treatment expectations. The availability of validated outcome measures based on remission will enhance the conduct and reporting of clinical investigations, and could facilitate the design and interpretation of new studies on cognition and functional outcomes. While useful as a concept, it is important to consider that remission is distinct from recovery. CONCLUSION: The introduction of standardized remission criteria may offer significant opportunities for clinical practice, health services research and clinical trials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The personal recovery approach aims to have users' perspective at the heart of service development and research, and is considered distinct from clinical recovery that focuses on achieving clinically-defined goals.
“This approach aims to have users' perspective at the heart of service development and research, and it is considered distinct from “clinical recovery” that focuses on achieving clinically-defined goals (10–13).”
From Recovery from Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 285
- Authors
- van Os, J., Burns, T., Cavallaro, R., Leucht, S., Peuskens, J., Helldin, L., Bernardo, M., Arango, C., Fleischhacker, W., Lachaux, B., & Kane, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
- Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
- Zucker Hillside Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-21
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-95
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2070190614
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, symptom remission, remission criteria, recovery, outcome measures, clinical trials, treatment expectations, cognitive outcomes, functional outcome
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Remission Induction, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review