The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The in vitro effect of different PRP concentrations on osteoblasts and fibroblasts
Abstract
Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the biological rationale for the use of platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) by evaluating the effect of different concentrations of PRP on osteoblasts (OB) and fibroblasts (FB) function in vitro. Material and methods: PRP was obtained from volunteer donors using standard protocols. Primary human cultures of oral FBs and OBs were exposed to both activated and non‐activated plasma as well as various concentrations of PRP (2.5 ×, 3.5 × and max (4.2–5.5 ×)). Cell proliferation was evaluated after 24 and 72 h using an MTT proliferation assay. Production of osteocalcin (OCN), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF‐β1) was evaluated in OB after 24 and 72 h. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA. Results: PRP‐stimulated cell proliferation in both OBs and FBs. The effect of different PRP concentrations on cell proliferation was most notable at 72 h. The maximum effect was achieved with a concentration of 2.5 ×, with higher concentrations resulting in a reduction of cell proliferation. Upregulation of OCN levels and downregulation of OPG levels were noted with increasing PRP concentrations at both 24 and 72 h. TGF‐β1 levels were stimulated by increasing concentrations of PRP, with the increased levels being maintained at 72 h. Conclusions: PRP preparations exert a dose‐specific effect on oral FBs and OBs. Optimal results were observed at a platelet concentration of 2.5 ×, which was approximately half of the maximal concentrate that could be obtained. Increased concentrations resulted in a reduction in proliferation and a suboptimal effect on OB function. Hence, different PRP concentrations may have an impact on the results that can be obtained in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Platelet-Rich Plasma: New Performance Understandings and Therapeutic Considerations in 2020
(2020) · doi:10.3390/ijms21207794 · Cited by 1,039
A Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma: History, Biology, Mechanism of Action, and Classification
Alves, R., & Grimalt, R. (2018) · Skin Appendage Disorders · doi:10.1159/000477353 · Cited by 732
Platelet-Rich Plasma: The PAW Classification System
DeLong, J. M., Russell, R. P., & Mazzocca, A. D. (2012) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.148 · Cited by 623
Dohan Ehrenfest, D. M., de Peppo, G. M., Doglioli, P., & Sammartino, G. (2009) · Growth Factors · doi:10.1080/08977190802636713 · Cited by 593
Platelet-Rich Plasma Differs According to Preparation Method and Human Variability
Mazzocca, A. D., McCarthy, M. B. R., Chowaniec, D. M., Cote, M. P., Romeo, A. A., Bradley, J. P., Arciero, R. A., & Beitzel, K. (2012) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.00430 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Graziani, F., Ivanovski, S., Cei, S., Ducci, F., Tonetti, M., & Gabriele, M.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212-219
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2013518981
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The in vitro effect of different PRP concentrations on osteoblasts and fibroblasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01203.x
- The paper
- Graziani, F., Ivanovski, S., Cei, S., Ducci, F., Tonetti, M., & Gabriele, M. (2006). The in vitro effect of different PRP concentrations on osteoblasts and fibroblasts. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01203.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.