Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,063

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A systematic review of the 5‐year survival and complication rates of implant‐supported single crowns

Open access
Jung, Ronald E., Pjetursson, Bjarni E., Glauser, Roland, Zembic, Anja, Zwahlen, Marcel, Lang, Niklaus P.·2008·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5‐year survival of implant‐supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. Methods: An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on SCs with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random‐effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5‐year proportions. Results: Twenty‐six studies from an initial yield of 3601 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. In a meta‐analysis of these studies, survival of implants supporting SCs was 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.9–97.6%] after 5 years. The survival rate of SCs supported by implants was 94.5% (95% CI: 92.5–95.9%) after 5 years of function. The survival rate of metal–ceramic crowns, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.6–96.7%), was significantly (P=0.005) higher than the survival rate, 91.2% (95% CI: 86.8–94.2%), of all‐ceramic crowns. Peri‐implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred adjacent to 9.7% of the SCs and 6.3% of the implants had bone loss exceeding 2 mm over the 5‐year observation period. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.14%. After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of screw or abutment loosening was 12.7% and 0.35% for screw or abutment fracture. For supra‐structure‐related complications, the cumulative incidence of ceramic or veneer fractures was 4.5%. Conclusion: It can be concluded that after an observation period of 5 years, high survival rates for implants and implant‐supported SCs can be expected. However, biological and particularly technical complications are frequent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Jung, R. E., Pjetursson, B. E., Glauser, R., Zembic, A., Zwahlen, M., & Lang, N. P.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-07
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
119-130
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W2148689027
Cited by
1,063
References
0
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the 5‐year survival and complication rates of implant‐supported single crowns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
The paper
Jung, R. E., Pjetursson, B. E., Glauser, R., Zembic, A., Zwahlen, M., & Lang, N. P. (2008). A systematic review of the 5‐year survival and complication rates of implant‐supported single crowns. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.