Preferences of dental care providers in maintaining compromised teeth in relation to their professional status: implants instead of periodontally involved maxillary molars?: Decision making in maxillary molars
Open accessAbstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dentists' decision making in the maxillary molar region to find out how it is influenced by general practitioners' and specialists' characteristics as well as by the external evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was developed containing clinical cases and statements to assess practitioners' opinions on the treatment of periodontally involved maxillary molars and implant therapy with sinus grafting. Data were analysed with respect to the dentists' age and specialty. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty questionnaires were evaluated (24% from universities, 76% from educational courses, overall response rate 35.1%). Forty six per cent of all participants indicated they had specialised, 52% placed dental implants, while 33% performed sinus grafting and 64% periodontal surgeries. Forty six per cent were against or were indecisive about having sinus grafting performed on themselves. The treatment proposals given for the clinical cases revealed a preference among older dentists and general practitioners for regenerative treatments even when these were not evidence based in through-and-through furcation involvements. Resective therapies were most often selected by periodontists. Prosthodontists tended to prefer more invasive treatment options with extractions and augmentations. More experienced general practitioners favoured conventional fixed dental prostheses in free-end situations or no treatment rather than the complicated augmentation procedures, which were preferred by younger dentists. CONCLUSIONS: Implant placement seems to be widely accepted by almost all subjects, who may either place implants themselves or refer patients. More information seems to be needed on the indications for regenerative therapies for furcation involved maxillary molars, and guidelines required for decision making in complex clinical situations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Success rates may be lower, and complication rates higher when compared with evaluations of efficacy in highly selected populations recruited to clinical trials, in which participants are typically treated by specialized clinicians in university or other expert settings.
“Success rates may thereby be lower, and complication rates higher when compared with evaluations of efficacy in highly selected populations recruited to clinical trials, in which participants are typically treated by specialized clinicians in university or other expert settings (Zitzmann et al. 2011).”
From Dental Research in the Digital Age: The Registry-Based Clinical Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as Zitzmann et al. 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dental Research in the Digital Age: The Registry-Based Clinical Trial.
Joda, T., Settecase, E., Heitz‐Mayfield, L., Derks, J., Jung, R. E., & Zitzmann, N. U. (2026) · Clinical oral implants research · doi:10.1111/clr.70061 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Zitzmann, N. U., Scherrer, S. S., Weiger, R., Lang, N. P., & Walter, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Prince Philip Dental Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zitzmann, Nicola U.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-29
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-150
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125256785
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Oral Implants Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
- Keywords
- dental implant surgery, furcation involvement, sinus floor augmentation, regenerative periodontal therapy, tooth extraction, dental treatment decision-making, dentist age, general practitioners, periodontists, prosthodontists, fixed partial dentures
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, General Practice, Dental, Humans, Male, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Molar, Periodontitis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Implants, Practice Patterns, Dentists'
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review