The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels
Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine how accurately periodontal probes measure connective tissue attachment levels in beagle dogs with (1) clinically healthy gin‐givae, (2) experimental gingivitis, and (3) periodontitis. In the healthy and experimental gingivitis specimens die probes were inserted with a standardized force of 25 ponds. In periodontitis specimens the probes were inserted with a gentle, but non standardized force After insertion, 120 plastic periodontal probes (40 in each group) were held in place by fusing them to the teeth. Blocks of periodontal tissue with the probes in situ were subsequently processed and serially sectioned. Histometric measurements were made from the sections in order to compare the level of connective tissue attachment to the level of probe penetration. In healthy specimens the probes consistently failed to reach the apical termination of the junctional epithelium (x =−0.39 mm). In the experimental gingivitis group most probes came closer to the apical termination of the junctional epithelium, but on the average stilt fell short by x =−0.10 mm. In periodontitis specimens the probes consistently went past the most apical cells of the junctional epithelium (x =+0.24 mm). A significant relationship between the degree of inflammation and level of probe penetration was found. No relationship was observed between histological and clinical sulcus depths. It is concluded that in beagle dogs (1) periodontal probes do not precisely measure connective tissue attachment levels, (2) inflammation has a significant influence on the degree of probe penetration, and (3) histological and clinical sulcus depths differ significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condition
Silness, J., & Löe, H. (1964) · Acta Odontologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016356408993968 · Cited by 7,932
Self-citation
Cited by
Bleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?
Lang, N. P., Joss, A., Orsanic, T., Gusberti, F. A., & Siegrist, B. E. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00852.x · Cited by 671
Absence of bleeding on probing An indicator of periodontal stability
Lang, N. P., Adler, R., Joss, A., & Nyman, S. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01059.x · Cited by 671
Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults
Axelsson, P., & Lindhe, J. (1978) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1978.tb01914.x · Cited by 624
Bleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice
Joss, A., Adler, R., & Lang, N. P. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1994.tb00737.x · Cited by 261
A Randomized Four‐Year Study of Periodontal Therapy
Pihlstrom, B. L., Ortiz‐Campos, C., & McHugh, R. B. (1981) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1981.52.5.227 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Armitage, G. C., Svanberc, G. K., & Löe, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 173-190
- ISSN
- 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2118080802
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb02271.x
- The paper
- Armitage, G. C., Svanberc, G. K., & Löe, H. (1977). Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb02271.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.