Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels

Armitage, Gary C., Svanberc, Gunnar K., Löe, Harald·1977·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine how accurately periodontal probes measure connective tissue attachment levels in beagle dogs with (1) clinically healthy gin‐givae, (2) experimental gingivitis, and (3) periodontitis. In the healthy and experimental gingivitis specimens die probes were inserted with a standardized force of 25 ponds. In periodontitis specimens the probes were inserted with a gentle, but non standardized force After insertion, 120 plastic periodontal probes (40 in each group) were held in place by fusing them to the teeth. Blocks of periodontal tissue with the probes in situ were subsequently processed and serially sectioned. Histometric measurements were made from the sections in order to compare the level of connective tissue attachment to the level of probe penetration. In healthy specimens the probes consistently failed to reach the apical termination of the junctional epithelium (x =−0.39 mm). In the experimental gingivitis group most probes came closer to the apical termination of the junctional epithelium, but on the average stilt fell short by x =−0.10 mm. In periodontitis specimens the probes consistently went past the most apical cells of the junctional epithelium (x =+0.24 mm). A significant relationship between the degree of inflammation and level of probe penetration was found. No relationship was observed between histological and clinical sulcus depths. It is concluded that in beagle dogs (1) periodontal probes do not precisely measure connective tissue attachment levels, (2) inflammation has a significant influence on the degree of probe penetration, and (3) histological and clinical sulcus depths differ significantly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb02271.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Armitage, G. C., Svanberc, G. K., & Löe, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
173-190
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2118080802
Cited by
404
References
1
FWCI
23.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb02271.x
The paper
Armitage, G. C., Svanberc, G. K., & Löe, H. (1977). Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb02271.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.