Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Healing following surgical non‐surgical treatment of periodontal disease: A clinical study

Lindhe, Jan, Westfelt, Elisabeth, Nyman, Sture, Socransky, Sigmund S., Heijl, Lars, Bratthall, Gunilla·1982·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract A clinical trial was undertaken to study the effect of one surgical and one non‐surgical treatment modality in patients with advanced periodontal disease. Fifteen patients were selected for the study. Following a Baseline examination comprising assessments of oral hygiene status, gingival conditions, probing depths and attachment levels, all participants were subjected to treatment. In each patient, scaling and root planing were carried out in conjunction with the modified Widman flap procedure in two jaw quadrants while in the contralateral quadrants the treatment was restricted to scaling and root planing. During the phase of active treatment, i.e. the period between the first and last operation, and for the subsequent 6 months of healing, the patients were subjected to “professional toothcleaning” once every 2 weeks. From this time until the end of the trial which was 24 months after active treatment, the patients were recalled for prophylaxis once every 3 months. Reexaminations were performed 6, 12 and 24 months after the completion of active treatment. The results demonstrated that scaling and root planing used alone were almost equally effective as their use in combination with the modified Widman flap procedure in establishing clinically healthy gingiva and in preventing further loss of attachment. Both treatment modalities prevented recurrence of periodontal disease for the 24 months of observation. The analysis of the probing depth data revealed that both methods of treatment resulted in a high frequency of probing depths of <4 mm. The probing depth reduction was more pronounced in initially deep than in initially shallow pockets and, for initially deep pockets, more marked in sites subjected to surgery than in sites exposed to scaling and root planing alone. The measurements also showed that sites with initially deep pockets exhibited more pronounced gain of clinical attachment than sites with initially shallow pockets. Significant loss of attachment did not occur in sites treated with scaling and root planing alone while attachment loss was found following Widman flap surgery in sites with initial probing depth of <4 mm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb01227.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Lindhe, J., Westfelt, E., Nyman, S., Socransky, S. S., Heijl, L., & Bratthall, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-04
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
115-128
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W1787348899
Cited by
357
References
2
FWCI
29.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healing following surgical non‐surgical treatment of periodontal disease: A clinical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb01227.x
The paper
Lindhe, J., Westfelt, E., Nyman, S., Socransky, S. S., Heijl, L., & Bratthall, G. (1982). Healing following surgical non‐surgical treatment of periodontal disease: A clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb01227.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.