The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity*
Abstract
Abstract Clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity have been numerous and protocols varied. To date there is little consensus as to the conduct of studies on this poorly‐understood yet common and painful dental condition. A committee of interested persons from academia and industry was convened to discuss the subject of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity and a consensus report is presented. A double‐blind randomized parallel groups design is recommended, although cross‐over designs may be used for the preliminary screening of agents. Subjects may have multiple sites scored. Sample size will be determined by estimating the variability in the study population, the effect to be detected and the power of the statistical test to be used. Subject selection is based on a clinical diagnosis of dentine hypersensitivity, excluding those with conflicting characteristics such as currently‐active medical or dental therapy. The vestibular surfaces of incisors, cuspids and bicuspids are preferred as sites to be tested. A range of sensitivity levels should be included. Tactile, cold and evaporative air stimuli should be applied. Negative and benchmark controls should be incorporated. Most trials should last 8 weeks. Sensitivity may be assessed either in terms of the stimulus intensity required to evoke pain or the subjective evaluation of pain produced by a stimulus using a visual analog or other appropriate scale. The subject's overall assessment may be determined by questionnaire. Outcomes should be expressed in terms of clinically significant changes in symptoms. Follow‐up evaluation is required to determine the persistence of changes. At least 2 independent trials should be conducted before a product receives approval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Managing dentin hypersensitivity
Orchardson, R., & Gillam, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321 · Cited by 537
Self-citationCortellini, P., & Bissada, N. F. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0671 · Cited by 473
Management of dentine hypersensitivity: efficacy of professionally and self‐administered agents
West, N. X., Seong, J., & Davies, M. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12336 · Cited by 138
Network meta-analysis on the effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity
Hu, M.-L., Zheng, G., Lin, H., Yang, M., Zhang, Y.-D., & Han, J.-M. (2019) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.008 · Cited by 60
Limeback, H., Enax, J., & Meyer, F. (2023) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics8010023 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, G. R., Narhi, M. N., Addy, M., Gangarosa, L., & Orchardson, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 808-813
- ISSN
- 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2023972394
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x
- The paper
- Holland, G. R., Narhi, M. N., Addy, M., Gangarosa, L., & Orchardson, R. (1997). Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity*. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.