The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant‐supported restorations, aesthetic and patient‐reported outcomes
Open accessAbstract
The articles discussed in working group 3 dealt with specific aspects of clinical research. In this context, the literature reporting on survival and complication rates of implant‐supported or implant‐tooth supported restorations in longitudinal studies of at least 5 years were discussed. The second aspect dealt with the evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in clinical studies and the related index systems available. Finally, the third aspect discussed dealt with patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM s). A detailed appraisal of the available methodology was presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient satisfaction and function are key determinants of treatment acceptance and long-term success.
“aligning with evidence that patient satisfaction and function are key determinants of treatment acceptance and long‐term success (Abou‐Ayash et al. 2023; Lang and Zitzmann 2012; Tonetti et al. 2025; Tonetti, Sanz, et al. 2023; Yao et al. 2018).”
From 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines: Identifying a Core Outcome Set for Implant Dentistry in Edentulous Maxilla Rehabilitation (2026) · cites this paper as Lang and Zitzmann 2012
The sections “What constitutes a PROM?” and “What are the potential uses of PROMs within implant research among dentate subjects?” (page numbers unavailable) treat satisfaction and patients’ perceptions of daily-life impact as important outcomes that can inform treatment decisions. The paper does not establish that satisfaction and function determine treatment acceptance or long-term success; its study-design section discusses long-term success separately in terms of survival and complications. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1902/jop.2009.080435 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01840.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01698.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x · DOI
- Jemt T., 1997, Regeneration of gingival papillae after single‐implant treatment, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 117, 327
- 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01841.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01828.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faggion, C. M., Liu, J., Huda, F., & Atieh, M. (2014) · Journal of Periodontal Research · doi:10.1111/jre.12092 · Cited by 31
Brunello, G., Lin, G., Kopp, I., Carrasco‐Labra, A., Jung, R. E., Wang, H., Schwarz, F., & Strauss, F. J. (2026) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.70075 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lang, N. P., Zitzmann, N. U., & on behalf of Working Group 3 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology
- Affiliations
- Prince Philip Dental Hospital (CN)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Lang, Niklaus P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- s12
- Pages
- 133-138
- ISSN
- 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2135085280
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
- Keywords
- implant-supported prostheses, dental implant survival, dental implant complications, cosmetic outcome, patient-reported outcome measures
- MeSH terms
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Esthetics, Dental, Humans, Research Design, Dental Implants, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
