The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 – Results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)
Open accessAbstract
Background: Continual surveillance based on patch test results has proved useful for the identification of contact allergy. Objectives: To provide a current view on the spectrum of contact allergy to important sensitizers across Europe. Patients/Methods: Clinical and patch test data of 19 793 patients patch tested in 2005/2006 in the 31 participating departments from 10 European countries (the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies' (ESSCA) www.essca‐dc.org) were descriptively analysed, aggregated to four European regions. Results: Nickel sulfate remains the most common allergen with standardized prevalences ranging from 19.7% (central Europe) to 24.4% (southern Europe). While a number of allergens shows limited variation across the four regions, such as Myroxylon pereirae (5.3–6.8%), cobalt chloride (6.2–8.8%) or thiuram mix (1.7–2.4%), the differences observed with other allergens may hint on underlying differences in exposures, for example: dichromate 2.4% in the UK (west) versus 4.5–5.9% in the remaining EU regions, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 4.1% in the South versus 2.1–2.7% in the remaining regions. Conclusions: Notwithstanding residual methodological variation (affecting at least some ‘difficult’ allergens) tackled by ongoing efforts for standardization, a comparative analysis as presented provides (i) a broad overview on contact allergy frequencies and (ii) interesting starting points for further, in‐depth investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal Allergy—A Review on Exposures, Penetration, Genetics, Prevalence, and Clinical Implications
Thyssen, J. P., & Menné, T. (2010) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx9002726 · Cited by 398
Preservatives and Fragrances in Selected Consumer‐Available Cosmetics and Detergents
Yazar, K., Johnsson, S., Lind, M.-L., Boman, A., & Lidén, C. (2011) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01828.x · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Uter, W., Rämsch, C., Aberer, W., Ayala, F., Balato, A., Beliauskiene, A., Fortina, A. B., Bircher, A., Brasch, J., Chowdhury, M. M. U., Coenraads, P., Schuttelaar, M., Cooper, S., Corradin, M. T., Elsner, P., English, J. S. C., Fartasch, M., Mahler, V., Frosch, P. J., Fuchs, T., Gawkrodger, D. J., Gimènez‐Arnau, A., Green, C. M., Horne, H. L., Jolanki, R., King, C. M., Krêcisz, B., Kiec‐Swierczynska, M., Ormerod, A. D., Orton, D. I., Peserico, A., Rantanen, T., Rustemeyer, T., Sansom, J. E., Simon, D., Statham, B. N., Wilkinson, M., & Schnuch, A.
- Venue
- Contact Dermatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0536
- OpenAlex
- W2117265397
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 – Results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01572.x
- The paper
- Uter, W., Rämsch, C., Aberer, W., Ayala, F., Balato, A., Beliauskiene, A., Fortina, A. B., Bircher, A., Brasch, J., Chowdhury, M. M. U., Coenraads, P., Schuttelaar, M., Cooper, S., Corradin, M. T., Elsner, P., English, J. S. C., Fartasch, M., Mahler, V., Frosch, P. J., . . . Schnuch, A. (2009). The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 – Results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01572.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.