The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same?
Abstract
We compare the ecological and habitat characteristics of alien and native vascular plants which have recently expanded in range m England, Scotland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands In the great majority of respects, expanding aliens and natives are functionally indistinguishable However, there are a few consistent differences aliens are more likely than natives to be clonal, polycarpic perennials with erect, leafy stems, and to have transient seed banks We discuss these trends m the context of the difficulties faced by aliens in invading mostly closed plant communities in relatively cool, damp climates Our results are consistent with some predictions of the attributes of‘ideal’invaders, but contradict others We argue that the ecological attributes of successful alien invaders are strongly habitat‐dependent
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology
Lodge, D. M. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-k · Cited by 1,717
Biological Invasions. A global perspective.
Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M., & Williamson, M. (1989) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18199125 · Cited by 1,663
Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species
Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J., & Hunt, R. (1989) · Cited by 1,582
Self-citationVegetation classification by reference to strategies
Grime, J. P. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/250026a0 · Cited by 1,571
New flora of the British Isles
Stace, C. A., & Thompson, H. S. (1991) · Cited by 1,567
Plant strategies and vegetation processes
Goodall, D. W. (1980) · Landscape Planning · doi:10.1016/0304-3924(80)90019-2 · Cited by 1,537
Clapham, A. R., Tütin, T. G., & Warburg, E. F. (1984) · Cited by 1,191
Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective
Kruger, F. J. L., Groves, R. H., & di Castri, F. (1989) · Cited by 1,150
The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa.
Macdonald, I. A. W., Kruger, F. J. L., & Ferrar, A. A. (1986) · Management of Biological Invasions · Cited by 476
Cited by
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 · Cited by 2,825
Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions
Shea, K. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02495-3 · Cited by 2,271
Daehler, C. C. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403 · Cited by 1,363
Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand?
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2007) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_7 · Cited by 1,048
A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A., & Halloy, S. R. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0297 · Cited by 831
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., & Rich, T. C. G.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 390-402
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2138321293
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00142.x
- The paper
- Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., & Rich, T. C. G. (1995). Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00142.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
