The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What drives fine‐scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose
Abstract
Understanding animal movements across heterogeneous landscapes is of great interest because it helps explain the dynamic processes influencing the distribution of individuals in space. Research on how animals move relative to short‐range environmental characteristics are scarce. Our objective was to determine the variables influencing movement of a large ungulate, the moose Alces alces , ranging across a boreal landscape, and to link movement behaviour with limiting factors at a fine scale. We assessed 7 candidate models composed of vegetation, solar energy, and topography variables using step selection functions (SSF) for male and female moose across daily and annual periods. We selected and weighted models using the Bayesian Information Criterion. Variables influencing small‐scale movements of moose differed among periods and between sexes, likely in response to corresponding changes in the importance of limiting factors. Best models often combined many types of variables, although simpler models composed of only vegetation or topography variables explained male's movements during rut and early winter. Moose steps were observed in good feeding stands from summer to early winter for females and from spring to early winter for males, supporting other studies of moose habitat selection. From summer to early winter, females alternatively selected and avoided cover stands during day and night, respectively. Solar energy reaching the ground was important, particularly during late winter and spring, likely due to its effect on snow cover, air temperature, or plant phenology. Moose generally moved in gentle slopes and variable elevation, which may have increased their chances of finding high quality forage, or improved their search of suitable calving sites or mates. Our study revealed the great complexity and dynamic aspects of animal movements in a heterogeneous landscape. Analysis of animal movement provides complementary information to more static habitat selection analyses and helps understanding the spatial variations in the distribution of individuals through time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“slope is known to have an impact on species displacement movement”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Leblond et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park
Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0953 · Cited by 1,351
ELK ALTER HABITAT SELECTION AS AN ANTIPREDATOR RESPONSE TO WOLVES
Creel, S., Winnie, J., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., & Creel, M. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-0032 · Cited by 774
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-005-0062-8 · DOI
- 10.2307/2265671 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90006-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471725153 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/343878 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 · DOI
- Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach
- Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1984, Guide to the care and use of experimental animals
- 10.1139/cjz-76-9-1663 · DOI
- 10.7589/0090-3558-35.1.38 · DOI
- 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682839 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04263.x · DOI
- 10.1139/z05-140 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-006-0463-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00776423 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-005-2075-8 · DOI
- 10.2193/0084-0173(2006)165[1:CSOWCI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1038/23876 · DOI
- 10.7557/2.16.4.1219 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.x · DOI
- Hosmer D. W., 1989, Applied logistic regression analysis
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1840:AMBATU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00595.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1937156 · DOI
- 10.2307/1383163 · DOI
- 10.1080/136588197242266 · DOI
- 10.2193/2008-063 · DOI
- 10.1080/09670870412331286049 · DOI
- 10.2307/1382821 · DOI
- Manly B. F. J., 2002, Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies
- Miquelle D. G., 1992, Sexual segregation in Alaskan moose, Wildl. Monogr, 122, 1
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990205.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1939267 · DOI
- Mysterud A., 1999, Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography, Wildl. Soc. Bull, 27, 385
- 10.2981/wlb.1997.004 · DOI
- 10.1139/z99-118 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00889.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3801180 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199812)12:15<2339::AID-HYP800>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1322:CVPPAN]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:BINV.0000034618.93140.a5 · DOI
- 10.2307/3802610 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00303.x · DOI
- 10.1139/z91-431 · DOI
- 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
- Skogland T., 1984, Wild reindeer foraging‐niche organisation, Holarct. Ecol, 7, 345
- 10.2193/2007-140 · DOI
- 10.2307/2389364 · DOI
- 10.1139/z79-283 · DOI
- Tilman D., 1997, Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions
- Turchin P., 1998, Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modelling population redistribution in animals and plants
- 10.7591/9781501732355 · DOI
- 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[55:HSBFSS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2307/1939381 · DOI
- Wilton M. L., 1991, Preliminary findings regarding elevation as a major factor in moose calving site selection in south central Ontario, Canada, Alces, 27, 111
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1019:SSFLLI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Montgomery, R. A., Vucetich, J. A., Roloff, G. J., Bump, J. K., & Peterson, R. O. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091414 · Cited by 25
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Leblond, M., Dussault, C., & Ouellet, J.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1102-1112
- ISSN
- 0906-7590
- 1600-0587
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review