Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What drives fine‐scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose

Leblond, Mathieu, Dussault, Christian, Ouellet, Jean‐Pierre·2010·Ecography

Abstract

Understanding animal movements across heterogeneous landscapes is of great interest because it helps explain the dynamic processes influencing the distribution of individuals in space. Research on how animals move relative to short‐range environmental characteristics are scarce. Our objective was to determine the variables influencing movement of a large ungulate, the moose Alces alces , ranging across a boreal landscape, and to link movement behaviour with limiting factors at a fine scale. We assessed 7 candidate models composed of vegetation, solar energy, and topography variables using step selection functions (SSF) for male and female moose across daily and annual periods. We selected and weighted models using the Bayesian Information Criterion. Variables influencing small‐scale movements of moose differed among periods and between sexes, likely in response to corresponding changes in the importance of limiting factors. Best models often combined many types of variables, although simpler models composed of only vegetation or topography variables explained male's movements during rut and early winter. Moose steps were observed in good feeding stands from summer to early winter for females and from spring to early winter for males, supporting other studies of moose habitat selection. From summer to early winter, females alternatively selected and avoided cover stands during day and night, respectively. Solar energy reaching the ground was important, particularly during late winter and spring, likely due to its effect on snow cover, air temperature, or plant phenology. Moose generally moved in gentle slopes and variable elevation, which may have increased their chances of finding high quality forage, or improved their search of suitable calving sites or mates. Our study revealed the great complexity and dynamic aspects of animal movements in a heterogeneous landscape. Analysis of animal movement provides complementary information to more static habitat selection analyses and helps understanding the spatial variations in the distribution of individuals through time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06104.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.06.009 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10980-005-0062-8 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2265671 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90006-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/0471725153 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1086/343878 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 · DOI
  8. Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach
  9. Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1984, Guide to the care and use of experimental animals
  10. 10.1139/cjz-76-9-1663 · DOI
  11. 10.7589/0090-3558-35.1.38 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682839 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04263.x · DOI
  14. 10.1139/z05-140 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00442-006-0463-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00776423 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10980-005-2075-8 · DOI
  18. 10.2193/0084-0173(2006)165[1:CSOWCI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/23876 · DOI
  20. 10.7557/2.16.4.1219 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.x · DOI
  22. Hosmer D. W., 1989, Applied logistic regression analysis
  23. 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1840:AMBATU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00595.x · DOI
  25. 10.2307/1937156 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/1383163 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/136588197242266 · DOI
  28. 10.2193/2008-063 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/09670870412331286049 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/1382821 · DOI
  31. Manly B. F. J., 2002, Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies
  32. Miquelle D. G., 1992, Sexual segregation in Alaskan moose, Wildl. Monogr, 122, 1
  33. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990205.x · DOI
  34. 10.2307/1939267 · DOI
  35. Mysterud A., 1999, Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography, Wildl. Soc. Bull, 27, 385
  36. 10.2981/wlb.1997.004 · DOI
  37. 10.1139/z99-118 · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00889.x · DOI
  40. 10.2307/3801180 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199812)12:15<2339::AID-HYP800>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  42. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1322:CVPPAN]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. 10.1023/B:BINV.0000034618.93140.a5 · DOI
  44. 10.2307/3802610 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00303.x · DOI
  46. 10.1139/z91-431 · DOI
  47. 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Skogland T., 1984, Wild reindeer foraging‐niche organisation, Holarct. Ecol, 7, 345
  49. 10.2193/2007-140 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/2389364 · DOI
  51. 10.1139/z79-283 · DOI
  52. Tilman D., 1997, Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions
  53. Turchin P., 1998, Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modelling population redistribution in animals and plants
  54. 10.7591/9781501732355 · DOI
  55. 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[55:HSBFSS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  56. 10.2307/1939381 · DOI
  57. Wilton M. L., 1991, Preliminary findings regarding elevation as a major factor in moose calving site selection in south central Ontario, Canada, Alces, 27, 111
  58. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1019:SSFLLI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Leblond, M., Dussault, C., & Ouellet, J.
Venue
Ecography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1102-1112
ISSN
  • 0906-7590
  • 1600-0587
Cited by
77
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review