Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Steroids as Immunosuppressants in Pregnancy

Stites, D. P., Siiteri, P. K.·1983·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

In considering the potential of known reproductive hormones to act as immunoregulatory substances during pregnancy, progesterone clearly is an attractive candidate for the following reasons: 1) progesterone is a primitive hormone occurring in virtually all species; 2) it is the only hormone which has been shown to be absolutely essential for maintenance of pregnancy in a variety of mammals, including the human; 3) it has demonstrable in vivo and in vitro immunosuppressive effects when present in concentrations known to be present in the human placenta; 4) it has weak systemic effects compared to cortisol; 5) in many species including primates, it is produced by trophoblastic cells: potential targets of the maternal immune system. Inhibitory effects of progesterone on immune cells have been demonstrated despite the absence of classical steroid receptors for progesterone (Lippman 1979). Specific functions of human T-lymphocytes and macrophages are inhibited by concentrations of progesterone known to occur in the placenta (10(-6)-10(-5) M). Although similar effects are produced by cortisol, clear-cut differences exist in the mechanisms by which cortisol and progesterone act on immune cells. The results suggest, but do not prove, that progesterone does not act on immune cells by binding to the glucocorticoid receptor. This can be considered to be advantageous, for otherwise pregnancy could be associated with glucocorticoid toxicity. Remarkable local anti-inflammatory activity of progesterone has been observed in vivo, although the mechanism of this effect is poorly understood. The striking absence of inflammatory cells in the pregnant uterus until a few days before birth is consistent with known effects of progesterone from animal studies. Whether this regulatory effect on cell traffic is exerted directly by progesterone or by secondary mediators produced within the uterus remains to be determined. In either case, appropriate timing of the removal of progesterone's influence may constitute an integral part of the process of parturition. Post-partum resolution of the placental attachment-site has many of the cellular characteristics of transplant rejection. Furthermore, it has recently been proposed that inflammatory cells which invade the cervix may generate prostaglandins which mediate the biochemical changes that are essential for its dilation to allow escape of the fetus (Liggins 1981). If the processes begin prior to delivery as a consequence either of progesterone withdrawal or inhibition of its activity, parturition may in fact be considered as a delayed rejection process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1983.tb01093.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Stites, D. P., & Siiteri, P. K.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-10
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
117-138
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2025257148
Cited by
208
References
0
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Steroids as Immunosuppressants in Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-065x.1983.tb01093.x
The paper
Stites, D. P., & Siiteri, P. K. (1983). Steroids as Immunosuppressants in Pregnancy. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065x.1983.tb01093.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.